Daily Rules, Proposed Rules, and Notices of the Federal Government
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is considering the issuance of a license renewal to Byproduct Materials License No. 45-03499-08. This license is held by The College of William and Mary (the Licensee) in Williamsburg, Virginia. As part of its license renewal, the Licensee has requested an exemption from the requirement in 10 CFR 30.32(g) to list sealed sources by their manufacturer and model number as registered under the provisions of 10 CFR 32.210. The Licensee requested this exemption in a letter dated October 31, 2005. The NRC has prepared an Environmental Assessment (EA) in support of this proposed action in accordance with the requirements of Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Part 51 (10 CFR Part 51). Based on the EA, the NRC has concluded that a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) is appropriate with respect to the proposed action. The license renewal, including the approval of the exemption request, will be issued to the Licensee following the publication of this FONSI and EA in the
The proposed action would renew License No. 45-03499-08, including approval of the Licensee's request for exemption submitted on October 31, 2005. License No. 45-03499-08 was issued on September 14, 1990, pursuant to 10 CFR Parts 30 and 70, and has been amended periodically since that time. This license authorized the Licensee for laboratory research, calibration, and teaching and training of students. It also authorized the possession of neutron sources containing plutonium for storage incident to disposal.
On June 29, 2005, the Licensee submitted its renewal application for License No. 45-03499-08. In a letter dated October 31, 2005, submitted in response to an inquiry from the NRC, the Licensee requested an exemption from the requirement in 10 CFR 30.32(g) to list sealed sources by manufacturer and model number as registered under the provisions of 10 CFR 32.210. In requesting this exemption, the Licensee states that most of its source inventory consists of sealed sources which have long been in their possession and that most do not bear a manufacturer's name or model number, and that it therefore would be unable to provide that information.
The Licensee possesses neutron sources containing plutonium being held for disposal, and other sources of low activity, less than a millicurie each, and has possessed and used these sources for many years without incident. This exemption is needed to authorize the Licensee to continue to possess these sources.
10 CFR 30.11(a) states that the Commission may grant such exemptions from the requirements of the regulations as it determines are authorized by law and will not endanger life or property or the common defense and security and are otherwise in the public interest. The NRC staff has analyzed the Licensee's request to be authorized to receive and take possession of sealed sources and devices which have not been registered with the NRC under 10 CFR 32.210 or with an Agreement State. The NRC staff considered that the Licensee is qualified by sufficient training and experience and has sufficient facilities and equipment to handle these sources and
The proposed action is largely administrative in nature. The Licensee has handled sources and devices which have not been registered by the NRC under 10 CFR 32.210, or by an Agreement State, for many years. The Licensee is qualified by sufficient training and experience and has sufficient facilities and equipment to handle these sources and devices. Approving this exemption will have no environmental impact.
Due to the largely administrative nature of the proposed action, its environmental impacts are small. Additionally, denying the exemption request would result in no change in current environmental impacts. The environmental impacts of the proposed action and the no-action alternative are therefore similar, and the no-action alternative is accordingly not further considered.
The NRC staff has concluded that the proposed action will not significantly impact the quality of the human environment; the NRC staff concludes that the proposed action is the preferred alternative.
The NRC staff has determined that the proposed action is of a procedural nature, and will not affect listed species or critical habitat. Therefore, no further consultation is required under Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act. The NRC staff has also determined that the proposed action is not the type of activity that has the potential to cause effects on historic properties. Therefore, no further consultation is required under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act.
The NRC staff has prepared this EA in support of the proposed action. On the basis of this EA, the NRC finds that there are no significant environmental impacts from the proposed action, and that preparation of an environmental impact statement is not warranted. Accordingly, the NRC has determined that a Finding of No Significant Impact is appropriate.
Documents related to this action, including the application for exemption and supporting documentation, are available electronically at the NRC's Electronic Reading Room at
1. License renewal application dated June 29, 2005 [ML052130136]
2. Licensee letter dated October 31, 2005 [ML053130381]
If you do not have access to ADAMS, or if there are problems in accessing the documents located in ADAMS, contact the NRC Public Document Room (PDR) Reference staff at 1-800-397-4209, 301-415-4737, or by e-mail to
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.