Daily Rules, Proposed Rules, and Notices of the Federal Government
Under a Memorandum of Consultations pursuant to the 2003 bilateral Maritime Agreement between the United States and the People's Republic of China (China or the PRC), the PRC does not require U.S. Non-Vessel-Operating Common Carriers (NVOCCs) to make a cash deposit in a Chinese bank as would otherwise be required by Chinese regulations, so long as the NVOCC:
(1) Is a legal person registered by U.S. authorities;
(2) obtains an FMC license as an NVOCC; and
(3) provides evidence of financial responsibility in the total amount of Chinese Renminbi (RMB) 800,000 or U.S. $96,000.
An FMC-licensed U.S. NVOCC that voluntarily provides an additional surety bond in the amount of $21,000 (denominated in U.S. Dollars or Chinese Renminbi), which by its conditions is available for potential claims of the Ministry of Transport (MOT) of the PRC (as well as other Chinese agencies) for violations of the Chinese Regulations on International Maritime Transportation, may register in the PRC without paying the cash deposit otherwise required by Chinese law and regulation.
In 2004, the Commission issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPR) to explore mechanisms for NVOCCs to file proof of such additional financial responsibility. See 69 FR 4271 (January 29, 2004). On April 1, 2004, the Commission issued a final rule that amended its regulations governing proof of financial responsibility for ocean transportation intermediaries to allow an optional bond rider to be filed with a licensed NVOCC's proof of financial responsibility to provide additional proof of financial responsibility for such carriers serving the U.S. oceanborne trade with the PRC. Docket No. 04-02,
On April 15, 2011, the Commission received a communication from the Maritime Administration of the U.S. Department of Transportation, transmitting a request from the MOT to revise the Commission's regulations at Appendix E to Subpart C of Part 515—
The Commission issued a Notice of Inquiry (NOI) soliciting public commentary on the proposal on June 10, 2011. The NOI sought general comments on the optional China Bond Rider, and also presented three questions for particular study:
1. Describe how, and to what extent, the optional rider to the required NVOCC bond has impacted your company's business operations? Does this make for more certainty in your business operation? Has the optional rider to the required NVOCC bond impacted your overall business costs? If so, how?
2. What do you see as the advantages and disadvantages of an adjustment to the current optional rider to the required NVOCC bond?
3. Please explain whether, and if so, how significantly your business costs/operations would be affected by a provision that allows for adjustments to the U.S. Dollar amount required in a NVOCC optional China bond rider when the USD (U.S. Dollar) and the RMB (Renminbi) exchange rate fluctuates 20% higher or lower.
A more reasonable approach might be for China to determine the exchange value to be assigned in a given 12 month period, and allow NVOCC's to offset the bond coverage based on total bond value, adding any additional coverage as might be required to make up any shortfall not already covered by multiple branch offices. This would limit the bond transactions significantly, while providing simplicity and stability for all involved.
The NCBFAA also accepts that the respective currencies have fluctuated, and some justification exists for the Chinese Government's request to increase the amount of the optional Bond Rider. Additionally, although the NCBFAA does not object to the Commission's consideration of an optional Bond Rider adjustment any time the currency values fluctuate more than 20%, it does not believe that an automatic adjustment “is necessary or appropriate.” The NCBFAA also echoes the beliefs of Mohawk and Econocaribe that many NVOCCs already have an aggregate coverage of greater than $125,000 (which would surpass the adjusted optional China Bond Rider amount of $122,000). If the Chinese Government assented, NCBFAA posits that allowing the NVOCCs to count all bond coverage might actually decrease the cost for many U.S.-licensed NVOCCs who do business in China. The NCBFAA looks to the Annex to the 2003 Bilateral Maritime Agreement for support, noting that it did not require a Bond Rider of a certain amount, but instead required evidence of financial responsibility of a certain total amount ($96,000). The Agreement left open how that total may be satisfied. The NCBFAA thus suggests that the Commission seek the Chinese Government's assent to accepting a total bond amount in addition to a Bond Rider in satisfying the $122,000 amount. Each NVOCC could thus determine whether it was more cost effective to procure a Bond Rider, or simply rely on its aggregate coverage amount that exceeded $122,000. This would reduce operating costs for some NVOCCs, but would still maintain adequate coverage.
The Commission also issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPR) soliciting public commentary on the proposal on January 5, 2012. The NPR sought general comments on the optional China Bond Rider and on the proposed rulemaking. The proposed rule amended Appendix F to Subpart C of Part 515 (group bonds) to increase the amount specified from $21,000 to $50,000. In response to the comments the Commission received from the Notice of Inquiry from June 10, 2012, the proposed rule amended Appendix E to Subpart C of Part 515 (individual NVOCC bonds) to remove pre-specified rider amounts to account for variances in NVOCCs' combined total surety levels maintained to meet the Commission's other financial responsibility requirements, including $10,000 in bond coverage that NVOCCs maintain for each of their branch offices pursuant to 46 CFR 515.21(a)(4). This recognition means that NVOCCs with branch offices may have rider amounts that vary to satisfy the level of coverage requested by the PRC, so long as their total coverage equals $125,000. The Commission sought comments particularly on the feasibility of these proposed revisions.
Zehner did express concern regarding the timing of implementation as riders can generally only be altered or added in accord with “the underlying bond's anniversary cycle.” Roanoke proposes a 12-month phase-in period in order to limit the impact of immediate compliance on the industry and FMC resources. Alternatively, Roanoke would request at least 90 days notice prior to the regulation taking effect as to allow time for proper processing of bonding alterations.
Roanoke also sought “additional clarity or guidance” regarding how to represent bond amounts in paragraphs 1.a. and 1.c. of FMC Form 48A when bonded U.S. office locations are involved.
Likewise, the comment “strongly endorses” FMC proposals to allow bond amounts to be aggregated. Fedex Trade Networks explains: “Allowing NVOCCs to meet the increased bond requirement by maintaining a bond of at least $125,000.00 would both fully satisfy the terms of the U.S.-China agreement and be more cost effective and efficient.”
In the 2003 Memorandum of Consultations between the U.S. and China, it was agreed that U.S. NVOCCs operating in the China trade would provide “evidence of financial responsibility in the total amount of Chinese Renminbi (RMB) 800,000 or U.S. $96,000.” The Memorandum of Consultations specifies amounts in both Chinese and United States currency, and did not provide for adjustment in exchange rates. Nevertheless, in recognition of the recent slight improvement in the value of the RMB against the U.S. Dollar (and in a spirit of comity and in conformity with Executive Order 13609,
The rule amends Appendix F to Subpart C of Part 515 (group bonds) to increase the amount specified from $21,000 to $50,000. In response to the comments the Commission received, the rule amends Appendix E to Subpart C of Part 515 (individual NVOCC bonds) to remove pre-specified rider amounts to account for variances in NVOCCs' combined total surety levels maintained to meet the Commission's other financial responsibility requirements, including $10,000 in bond coverage that NVOCCs maintain for each of their branch offices pursuant to 46 CFR 515.21(a)(4). This recognition means that NVOCCs with branch offices may have rider amounts that vary to satisfy the level of coverage requested by the PRC, so long as their total coverage equals $125,000.
The Commission intends to review the value of the total coverage provided by the optional China Bond Rider periodically.
Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 605(b), and in response to comments regarding small businesses affected by this optional China Bond Rider, a Regulatory Flexibility Threshold Analysis has been performed; it has been determined that the final rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
The small entities affected are ocean transportation intermediaries (OTIs). In determining whether a significant economic impact would occur under the new rule, the first estimate costs of the bond rider coverage were assessed. The economic impact of the optional China Bond Rider has been estimated to be less than $20 for every $1,000 of bond rider coverage, with most estimates being under $15 for every $1,000 of bond rider coverage. To that end, $21,000 of bond rider coverage would cost approximately $420.00 under this analysis. Given this information, it is determined that these first estimate costs are not significant to small entities. Uncertainty remains on the
To determine whether a substantial number of small entities would be affected, the OTI licensing statistics were reviewed. There are approximately 3,500 licensed U.S. OTIs that could file for the optional China Bond Rider; currently, only 350 OTIs have filed for the available optional China Bond Rider. This amounts to less than 10% of the entire market that may reasonably participate in the optional bond rider program. Based on this data, it is determined that a substantial number of small entities will not be affected by this rule.
It is important to note that the optional China Bond Rider is not an FMC-required bond; rather it is an alternative instrument crafted by the United States and China to relieve U.S. NVOCCs from the People's Republic of China's cash deposit requirement. The rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities as outlined by the Regulatory Flexibility Threshold Act.
The Commission certifies this rulemaking because the proposed changes establish an optional provision for U.S. licensed NVOCCs, which may be used at their discretion. While some of these businesses qualify as small entities under the guidelines of the Small Business Administration, the rule provides a more cost-effective alternative than would otherwise be available to assist U.S. licensed NVOCCs with their business endeavors in the PRC. As such, the rule helps to promote U.S. business interests in the PRC and facilitate U.S. foreign commerce.
The Chairman of the Commission certifies, pursuant to section 605(b) of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601
This rule is not a “major rule” under 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
The collection of information requirements contained in this rule have been submitted to the Office of Management and Budget for review under section 3504(h) of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, as amended. Public reporting burden for this collection of information was estimated to be 1.25 hours per response, including time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information.
Freight, Maritime carriers, Non-vessel-operating common carriers.
For the reasons stated in the supplementary information, the Federal Maritime Commission amends 46 CFR Part 515 as follows.
5 U.S.C. 553; 31 U.S.C. 9701; 46 U.S.C. 305, 40102, 40104, 40501-40503, 40901-40904, 41101-41109, 41301-41302, 41305-41307; Pub. L. 105-383, 112 Stat. 3411; 21 U.S.C. 862.
The undersigned [______], as Principal and [______], as Surety do hereby agree that the existing Bond No. [____] to the United States of America and filed with the Federal Maritime Commission pursuant to section 19 of the Shipping Act of 1984 is modified as follows:
1. The following condition is added to this Bond:
a. An additional condition of this Bond is that $_____ (payable in U.S. Dollars or Renminbi Yuan at the option of the Surety) shall be available to pay any fines and penalties for activities in the U.S.-China trades imposed by the Ministry of Communications of the People's Republic of China (“MOC”) or its authorized competent communications department of the people's government of the province, autonomous region or municipality directly under the Central Government or the State Administration of Industry and Commerce pursuant to the Regulations of the People's Republic of China on International Maritime Transportation and the Implementing Rules of the Regulations of the PRC on International Maritime Transportation promulgated by MOC Decree No. 1, January 20, 2003.
b. The liability of the Surety shall not be discharged by any payment or succession of payments pursuant to section 1 of this Rider, unless and until the payment or payments shall aggregate the amount set forth in section 1a of this Rider. In no event shall the Surety's obligation under this Rider exceed the amount set forth in section 1a regardless of the number of claims.
c. The total amount of coverage available under this Bond and all of its riders, available pursuant to the terms of section 1(a.) of this rider, equals $____. The total amount of aggregate coverage equals or exceeds $125,000.
d. This Rider is effective the [____] day of [______], 20 [______], and shall continue in effect until discharged, terminated as herein provided, or upon termination of the Bond in accordance with the sixth paragraph of the Bond. The Principal or the Surety may at any time terminate this Rider by written notice to the Federal Maritime Commission at its offices in Washington, DC, accompanied by proof of transmission of notice to MOC. Such termination shall become effective thirty (30) days after receipt of said notice and proof of transmission by the Federal Maritime Commission. The Surety shall not be liable for fines or penalties imposed on the Principal after the expiration of the 30-day period but such termination shall not affect the liability of the Principal and Surety for any fine or penalty imposed prior to the date when said termination becomes effective.
2. This Bond remains in full force and effect according to its terms except as modified above.
In witness whereof we have hereunto set our hands and seals on this [____] day of [______], 20 [____],
1. * * *
a. An additional condition of this Bond is that $ [____](payable in U.S. Dollars or Renminbi Yuan at the option of the Surety) shall be available to any NVOCC enumerated in an Appendix to this Rider to pay any fines and penalties for activities in the U.S.-China trades imposed by the Ministry of Communications of the People's Republic of China (“MOC”) or its authorized competent communications department of the people's government of the province, autonomous region or municipality directly under the Central Government or the State Administration of Industry and Commerce pursuant to the Regulations of the People's Republic of China on International Maritime Transportation and the Implementing Rules of the Regulations of the PRC on International Maritime Transportation promulgated by MOC Decree No. 1, January 20, 2003. Such amount is separate and distinct from the bond amount set forth in the first paragraph of this Bond. Payment under this Rider shall not reduce the bond amount in the first paragraph of this Bond or affect its availability. The Surety shall indicate that $50,000 is available to pay such fines and penalties for each NVOCC listed on appendix A to this Rider wishing to exercise this option.
By the Commission.