thefederalregister.com

Daily Rules, Proposed Rules, and Notices of the Federal Government

SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION

[Docket No. SSA-2012-0046]

Social Security Acquiescence Ruling (AR) 12-1(8); Correction; Petersen v. Astrue, 633 F.3d 633 (8th Cir. 2011): Whether a National Guard Technician Who Worked in Noncovered Employment is Exempt From the Windfall Elimination Provision (WEP)--Title II of the Social Security Act

AGENCY: Social Security Administration.
ACTION: Notice of Social Security Acquiescence Ruling; Correction.
SUMMARY: Social Security Acquiescence Ruling (AR) 12-1(8); Petersen v. Astrue, 633 F.3d 633 (8th Cir. 2011); Whether a National Guard Technician Who Worked in Noncovered Employment is Exempt From the Windfall Elimination Provision (WEP)--Title II of the Social Security Act.

Also, in the second column, correct the heading to read:

Acquiescence Ruling 12-1(8)

Paul Kryglik, Director, Office of Regulations, Social Security Administration.