Daily Rules, Proposed Rules, and Notices of the Federal Government
Throughout this document, whenever “we,” “us,” or “our” is used, we mean EPA.
On May 8, 2012, the Maryland Department of the Environment (MDE) submitted a formal SIP revision (#12-04) to EPA pertaining to regulation COMAR 188.8.131.52 “Control of Volatile Organic Compounds Emissions from Vehicle Refinishing.” The SIP revision establishes new volatile organic compounds (VOC) content limits for coating and cleaning solvents used in vehicle refinishing and standards for coating application, work practices, monitoring, and recordkeeping. On July 10, 2012 (77 FR 40550), EPA published a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPR) proposing approval of Maryland's revisions to COMAR 184.108.40.206 “Control of Volatile Organic Compounds Emissions from Vehicle Refinishing” as adopted by the State of Maryland on March 26, 2012. The compliance date of the adopted regulation COMAR 220.127.116.11 is July 1, 2013.
The SIP revision establishes VOC content limits for automotive coatings and cleaning solvents used in vehicle refinishing and standards for coating application, work practices, monitoring, and recordkeeping. Maryland's revisions to COMAR 18.104.22.168 include establishing VOC content limits for 11 categories of automotive coatings and two categories of cleaning solvents which are used in the preparation, application, and drying phases of vehicle refinishing. All affected sources must comply with provisions of this regulation by July 1, 2013. This SIP revision will achieve emission reductions of VOC throughout the State of Maryland.
Maryland's revisions to COMAR 22.214.171.124 are based on the 2009 “Model Rule for Motor Vehicle and Mobile Equipment Non-Assembly Line Coating Operations” (MVMERR) developed in conjunction with member states of the Ozone Transport Commission (OTC). The MVMERR and the adopted regulation COMAR 126.96.36.199 comply with EPA's requirements set forth in 40 CFR Part 59, subpart B “National Volatile Organic Compound Emissions Standards for Automobile Refinish Coatings” and 40 CFR part 63 subpart HHHHHH “National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Paint Stripping and Miscellaneous Surface Coating Operations at Area Sources.” Specific information concerning revisions to COMAR 188.8.131.52 and the rationale for EPA's proposed action are explained in the NPR and the Technical Support Document for this action, and will not be restated here. No public comments were received on the NPR.
EPA is approving Maryland's revisions to regulation COMAR 184.108.40.206 “Control of Volatile Organic Compounds Emissions from Vehicle Refinishing” adopted by MDE on March 26, 2012, as a revision to the Maryland SIP. The compliance date for this regulation is July 1, 2013.
Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. For that reason, this action:
• Is not a “significant regulatory action” subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
• Does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501
• Is certified as not having a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601
• Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
• Does not have Federalism implications as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
• Is not an economically significant regulatory action based on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the CAA; and
• Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by November 26, 2012. Filing a petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action. This action, which approves revisions to regulation COMAR 220.127.116.11, may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its requirements. (
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by reference, Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds.
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
42 U.S.C. 7401
(c) * * *