Daily Rules, Proposed Rules, and Notices of the Federal Government
ICC is in regular communication with representatives of its Clearing Participants, as that term is defined in the Rules of ICC (the "Rules") in relation to the operation of clearing processes and arrangements. The purpose of the proposed rule changes is to (i) implement new clearing certainty requirements consistent with Commodity Futures Trading Commission ("CFTC") Rules 39.12(b)(7) and 23.506, which become effective on October 1, 2012, and (ii) consolidate the rules in connection with the clearance of house and backloaded trades. These changes also seek to improve drafting and cross-references within the ICC Rules. All capitalized terms not defined herein are defined in the Rules.
In its filing with the Commission, ICC included statements concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule changes and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule changes. The text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in Item III below. ICC has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of these statements.
As noted above, the principal purpose of the proposed rule changes is to implement the CFTC's clearing certainty requirements and to conform such rules to the new CFTC Rules 39.12(b)(7)(ii) and (iii) and Rule 23.506. Specifically, the proposed rule changes affect Part 3 of the ICC Rules by addressing the timeframe under which trades must be accepted or rejected for clearing under new CFTC rules and consolidating the provisions governing the way new trades and backloaded trades are submitted to ICC. Finally, certain definitions found in Part 1 of the Rules are amended to account for changes in Part 3. Each of these changes is described in detail as follows.
In Part 1 of the ICC Rules, the definition of "Backloaded Trade" has been consolidated to cover trades that are intended to replace and backload an existing agreement on terms equivalent to a Contract either (i) between two Participants for their own accounts or (ii) to which a Non-Participant Party is party, where the relevant Participant is acting for such Non-Participant Party.
The original Rule 301(b), the statement relating to "Weekly Cycle Interdealer Trades" is deleted and consolidated with the new Rule 301(c), which covers Backloaded Trades. In addition, the original Rule 301(f) is deleted and consolidated into the new Rule 301(b). A corresponding consolidation is proposed for the original Rules 309(b) and Rule 309(c) in order to conform it to the changes made in Rule 301. ICC believes that these changes are improvements in operational services that are administrative in nature or codify existing practices.
Under the proposed new Rule 309(d), ICC has incorporated new CFTC Rule 39.12(b)(7)(ii), which requires, among other things, that ICC accept or reject trades submitted for clearance that are executed competitively on or subject to the rules of a designated contract market or swap execution facility as soon after execution as would be technologically practicable if fully automated systems were used.
Under the proposed new Rule 309(e), ICC has incorporated the new CFTC Rule 39.12(b)(7)(iii), which requires, among other things, that ICC accept or reject trades submitted for clearance that are not executed competitively on or subject to the rules of a designated contract market or swap execution facility as soon after submission for clearing as would be technologically practicable if fully automated systems were used.
Finally, under the new proposed Rule 315, ICC has incorporated the standards of CFTC Rule 1.74(b) and required that Participants must accept or reject each Trade submitted by or for the Participant or its customers as quickly as would be technologically practicable if fully automated systems were used. Participants would also be required to submit such Trades to ICC following such acceptance as quickly as would be practicable if fully automated systems were used.
ICC believes that the proposed rule changes are consistent with the purposes and requirements of Section 17A of the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder applicable to it. ICC believes that implementing the CFTC's clearing certainty requirements will comply with the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder.
ICC does not believe the proposed rule change would have any impact, or impose any burden, on competition.
Written comments relating to the proposed rule change have not been solicited or received. ICC will notify the Commission of any written comments received by ICC.
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods:
* Use the Commission's Internet comment form (
* Send an email to
* Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-ICC-2012-16 and should be submitted on or before October 26, 2012.
Section 19(b) of the Act
In its filing, ICC requested that the Commission approve this proposed rule change on an accelerated basis for good cause shown. ICC cites as the reason for this request that the rule change is a straightforward operational change that is required in order to be in compliance with CFTC Rules 39.12(b)(7) on the October 1, 2012 effective date of this rule.
The Commission finds good cause, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act, that the proposed rule change (SR-ICC-2012-16) be, and hereby is, approved on an accelerated basis.