Daily Rules, Proposed Rules, and Notices of the Federal Government
The Exchange proposes to permit ETP Holders to designate orders as Retail Orders for the purpose of qualifying for the Retail Order Tier by means of a tag in the order entry message. The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's Web site at
In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant parts of such statements.
The Exchange is proposing to permit ETP Holders to designate orders as Retail Orders for the purpose of qualifying for the Retail Order Tier by means of a tag in the order entry message. The Exchange proposes to implement the change effective December 1, 2012.
On August 1, 2012, the Exchange introduced the "Retail Order Tier," a new tier and corresponding credit in the Fee Schedule for ETP Holders, including Market Makers, that execute an average daily volume ("ADV") of Retail Orders during the particular month that is 0.40% or more of the U.S. Consolidated ADV.
As part of qualifying for the Retail Order Tier, an ETP Holder is required to designate certain of its order entry ports at the Exchange as "Retail Order Ports" and attest, in a form and/or manner prescribed by the Exchange, that all orders submitted to the Exchange via such Retail Order Ports are Retail Orders.
The Exchange proposes to provide an additional method for ETP Holders to designate orders as Retail Orders. Specifically, the Exchange proposes to allow ETP Holders to designate orders as Retail Orders by using a tag in the order entry message. ETP Holders would still be able to use Retail Order Ports to designate orders as Retail Orders.
As currently required with the use of Retail Order Ports to designate orders as Retail Orders, an ETP Holder designating orders as Retail Orders by using a tag in the order entry message will be required to have written policies and procedures reasonably designed to assure that it will only designate orders as Retail Orders if all requirements of a Retail Order are met. The written policies and procedures must require the ETP Holder to (i) exercise due diligence before entering a Retail Order to assure that entry as a Retail Order is in compliance with the requirements specified by the Exchange, and (ii) monitor whether orders entered as Retail Orders meet the applicable requirements. If the ETP Holder represents Retail Orders from another broker-dealer customer, the ETP Holder's supervisory procedures must be reasonably designed to assure that the orders it receives from such broker-dealer customer that it designates as Retail Orders meet the definition of a Retail Order. The ETP Holder must (i) obtain an annual written representation, in a form acceptable to the Exchange, from each broker-dealer customer that sends it orders to be designated as Retail Orders that entry of such orders as Retail Orders will be in compliance with the requirements specified by the Exchange, and (ii) monitor whether its broker-dealer customer's Retail Order flow continues to meet the applicable requirements.
The proposed change is not otherwise intended to address any other matter, and the Exchange is not aware of any significant problem that ETP Holders would have in complying with the proposed change.
The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with Section 6(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Act"),
The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is reasonable since permitting ETP Holders to use alternative methods to designate orders as Retail Orders will encourage the development of the Exchange's liquidity pool, and thus support the quality of price discovery, promote market transparency, and improve investor protection. The Exchange believes the proposed change is reasonable because it will provide ETP Holders alternative ways to designate orders as Retail Orders while ensuring that ETP Holders are required to have written policies and procedures designed to assure that they will only designate orders as Retail Orders if all requirements of a Retail Order are met.
The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is equitable and not unfairly discriminatory because it provides a second method for Retail Order designation and allows each ETP Holder to choose the designation method most convenient to it, recognizing that individual firms have different internal system configurations. By providing alternative avenues for ETP Holders to designate orders as Retail Orders, the Exchange believes that ETP Holders will choose the designation method that is most operationally efficient, potentially reducing transaction costs.
Finally, the Exchange notes that it operates in a highly competitive market in which market participants can readily favor competing venues. In such an environment, the Exchange must continually review, and consider adjusting, its fees and credits to remain competitive with other exchanges. For the reasons described above, the Exchange believes that the proposed rule change reflects this competitive environment.
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the proposed rule change.
The foregoing rule change is effective upon filing pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)
At any time within 60 days of the filing of such proposed rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods:
* Use the Commission's Internet comment form (
* Send an email to
* Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549.