Browse: Departments Dates Agencies
RIN ID: RIN 1625-ZA06
USC ID: [USCG-2005-23172]
SUBJECT CATEGORY: Marine Safety Center Address Change
DOCUMENT SUMMARY: This technical amendment makes non-substantive changes throughout chapters I of title 33 and title 46 of the Code of Federal Regulations. The purpose of this amendment is to change the address of the United States Coast Guard Marine Safety Center as it appears in Coast Guard regulations. This rule will have no substantive effect on the regulated public.
SUMMARY: Marine Safety Center; address change,
Submitting comments: If you submit a comment, please include your name and address, identify the docket number for this rulemaking (USCG 200523172), indicate the specific section of this document to which each comment applies, and give the reason for each comment. You may submit your comments and material by electronic means, mail, fax, or delivery to the Docket Management Facility at the address under ADDRESSES; but please submit your comments and material by only one means. If you submit them by mail or delivery, submit them in an unbound format, no larger than 8\1/2\ by 11 inches, suitable for copying and electronic filing. If you submit them by mail and would like to know that they reached the Facility, please enclose a stamped, selfaddressed postcard or envelope. We will consider all comments and material received during the comment period. We may change this rule in view of them.
Viewing comments and documents: To view comments, as well as documents mentioned in this preamble as being available in the docket, go to http://dms.dot.gov at any time, click on ``Simple Search,'' enter the last five digits of the docket number for this rulemaking, and click on ``Search.'' You may also visit the Docket Management Facility in room PL401 on the Plaza level of the Nassif Building, 400 Seventh, Street, SW., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Privacy Act: Anyone can search the electronic form of all comments received into any of our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association, business, labor union, etc.). You may review the Department of Transportation's Privacy Act Statement in the Federal Register published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477), or you may visit http://dms.dot.gov. Regulatory History
We did not publish a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) for this amendment. Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that this technical amendment is exempt from notice and comment rulemaking requirements because the amendment only makes nonsubstantive address changes. These changes will have no substantive effect on the public; therefore, it is unnecessary to publish an NPRM.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after publication in the Federal Register. The MSC left its previous location on December 9, 2005, and correspondence should be directed to the new address.
The office of the United States Coast Guard Marine Safety Center will change locations resulting in the need for an address change in the Code of Federal Regulations. This rule also changes the abbreviated designation of the Marine Safety Center from ``GMSC'' to ``MSC'' throughout chapters I of title 33 and title 46.
This rule is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and does not require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not reviewed it under that Order. It is not ``significant'' under the regulatory policies and procedures of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). Because this amendment makes only address changes, we expect the economic impact to be so minimal that a full Regulatory Evaluation under the regulatory policies and procedures of DHS is unnecessary.
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601612), we have considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities'' comprises small businesses, notforprofit organizations that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
It is not expected that this amendment will have a significant economic impact on any small entities. Therefore, the Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this technical amendment will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
This amendment calls for no new collection of information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 35013520).
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132, Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this amendment under that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for federalism.
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 15311538) requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any one year. Though this amendment will not result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this amendment elsewhere in this preamble. Taking of Private Property
This amendment will not effect a taking of private property or otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property Rights.
This amendment meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
We have analyzed this amendment under Executive Order 13045, Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This amendment is not an economically significant rule and does not create an environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may disproportionately affect children.
This amendment does not have tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the
[[Page 75733]]
Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. Energy Effects
We have analyzed this amendment under Executive Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant energy action?'' under that order because it is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects under Executive Order 13211.
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15 U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress, through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus standards bodies.
This amendment does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
We have analyzed this rule under Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which guides the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 43214370f), and have concluded that there are no factors in this case that would limit the use of a categorical exclusion under section 2.B.2 of the Instruction. Therefore, this rule is categorically excluded, under figure 21, paragraph (34)(a), of the Instruction from further environmental documentation. Paragraph (34)(a) excludes regulatory actions that are editorial or procedural, such as those updating addresses. Under figure 21, paragraph (34)(a), of the Instruction, an Environmental Analysis Check List and a Categorical Exclusion Determination are not required for this technical amendment. List of Subjects
Maritime security, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Vessels.
Passenger vessels, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Terrorism.
Cargo vessels, Oil pollution, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Alaska, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Sewage disposal, Vessels.
Cargo vessels, Marine safety, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Cargo vessels, Fire prevention, Hazardous materials transportation, Marine safety, Occupational safety and health, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Vessels. 46 CFR Part 50
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Vessels. 46 CFR Part 63
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Vessels. 46 CFR Part 69
Measurement standards, Penalties, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Vessels.
Marine safety, Passenger vessels, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Cargo vessels, Marine safety, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Marine safety, Oil and gas exploration, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Vessels.
Fire prevention, Marine safety, Occupational safety and health, Oil and gas exploration, Vessels.
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Vessels. 46 CFR Part 116
Fire prevention, Marine safety, Passenger vessels, Seamen. 46 CFR Part 127
Cargo vessels, Fire prevention, Marine safety, Occupational safety and health, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Seamen. 46 CFR Part 133
Cargo vessels, Marine safety, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Administrative practice and procedure, Cargo vessels, Hazardous materials transportation, Marine safety, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Water pollution control.
Cargo vessels, Gases, Hazardous materials transportation, Marine safety, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Fire prevention, Marine safety, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Fire prevention, Marine safety, Oil pollution, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Marine safety, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Vessels. 46 CFR Part 177
Marine safety, Passenger vessels, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Marine safety, Oceanographic research vessels, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Cargo vessels, Marine safety, Oil and gas exploration, Passenger vessels, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, and under the authority of 14 U.S.C. 633; 5 U.S.C. 552(a); 33 CFR
[[Page 75734]]
1.051(a)(d); and, Department of Homeland Security Delegation No.
0170.1, the Coast Guard amends titles 33 and 46 of the Code of Federal Regulations as set forth below:
1. Wherever it appears in chapters I of titles 33 and/or 46, the phrase
``Commanding Officer, Marine Safety Center (MSC) 400 Seventh Street,
SW., Room 6302, Nassif Building, Washington, DC 205900001'' is revised
to read ``Commanding Officer (MSC), USCG Marine Safety Center, 1900
Half Street, SW., Suite 1000, Room 525, Washington, DC 20024 for
visitors and private courier service delivery. Send all regular mail to
Commanding Officer (MSC), USCG Marine Safety Center, 2100 2nd Street, SW., Washington, DC 20593.''
2. Wherever it appears in chapters I of titles 33 and/or 46, the phrase
``U.S. Coast Guard Marine Safety Center (GMSC)'' is revised to read ``U.S. Coast Guard Marine Safety Center (MSC)''.
Dated: December 15, 2005.
Stefan G. Venckus,
Chief, Office of Regulations and Administrative Law, United States Coast Guard.
[FR Doc. 0524319 Filed 122005; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 491015P
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT If you have questions on this amendment, call Commander Hung Nguyen, Executive Officer, United States Coast Guard Marine Safety Center, telephone 2024753400. If you have questions on viewing the docket, call Ms. Renee V. Wright, Program Manager, Docket Operations, telephone 2024930402.
14 CFR Part 39 40 CFR Part 52 14 CFR Part 71 33 CFR Part 165 50 CFR Part 679 47 CFR Part 73 26 CFR Part 1 40 CFR Part 180 33 CFR Part 117 50 CFR Part 17 44 CFR Part 67 50 CFR Part 648 14 CFR Part 97 33 CFR Part 100 40 CFR Part 63 50 CFR Part 622 44 CFR Part 65 50 CFR Part 660 26 CFR Part 301 39 CFR Part 111 40 CFR Part 300 6 CFR Part 5 40 CFR Part 271 47 CFR Part 64 40 CFR Parts 52 and 81 44 CFR Part 64 10 CFR Part 50 49 CFR Part 571 50 CFR Part 665 47 CFR Part 76