Browse: Departments Dates Agencies
Docket ID: [Docket No. 2008-1 CRB CD 98-99]
SUBJECT CATEGORY: Distribution of 1998 and 1999 Cable Royalty Funds
DOCUMENT SUMMARY: The Copyright Royalty Judges are announcing the commencement of a proceeding to determine the Phase II distribution of 1998 and 1999 royalties collected under the cable statutory license. The Judges also are announcing the date by which a party who wishes to participate in this distribution proceeding must file its Petition to Participate and the accompanying $150 filing fee.
SUMMARY: Distribution of 1998 and 1999 Cable Royalty Funds,
Each year, semiannually, cable systems must submit royalty payments to the Copyright Office as required by the cable statutory license for the privilege of retransmitting overtheair television and radio broadcast stations. 17 U.S.C. 111. These royalties are then distributed to copyright owners whose works were included in such retransmissions and who timely filed a claim for royalties. Distribution of the royalties for each calendar year are conducted by the Copyright Royalty Judges (``Judges'') in two phases. At Phase I, the royalties are divided among the representatives of the major categories of copyrightable content (movies, sports programming, music, etc.) requesting the distribution. At Phase II, the royalties are divided among the various copyright owners within each category.
This Notice announcing the commencement of a proceeding under 17
U.S.C. 803(b)(1) for distribution of cable royalties collected for 1998
and 1999 is confined to Phase II. A Phase I proceeding for these
royalty years was conducted by the Librarian of Congress under the
Copyright Arbitration Royalty Panel (``CARP'') system, the predecessor
to the Copyright Royalty Judges. The Librarian issued his determination
dividing the royalties among the eight Phase I claimant groups, 69 FR
3606 (January 26, 2004), and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District
of Columbia Circuit affirmed his determination. Program Suppliers v.
Librarian of Congress, 409 F.3d 395 (DC Cir. 2005). The Librarian did
not, however, resolve the Phase II distribution of these royalty years
and terminated the proceeding on August 10, 2007. 72 FR 45071.
Consequently, it is now necessary for the Copyright Royalty Judges to resolve this Phase II distribution.\1\
\1\ It is important to note that this is a new proceeding before
the Copyright Royalty Judges and not a transfer or continuation of a
prior proceeding of the Librarian. See Section 6(b)(1) of the
Copyright Royalty and Distribution Reform Act of 2004, Pub. L. No.
108419 (any CARP proceeding terminated by the Librarian ``shall become null and void'').
Consistent with 17 U.S.C. 804(b)(8), the Copyright Royalty Judges determine that a Phase II controversy exists as to the distribution of 1998 and 1999 cable royalties. We reach this determination, in this instance, for several reasons. First, we observe that certain interested parties represented to the Librarian some time ago that several Phase II controversies exist for these years. Second, the Program Suppliers have recently represented to us that a Phase II controversy with the National Association of Broadcasters remains for these years. Comments of the Program Suppliers on the Existence of a Controversy, at 5, n. 3 (filed in Docket No. 20054 CRB CD 2003 on September 19, 2007). And third, we have not received notification that any settlements have been reached, nor have we received motions for final distribution.
The Judges are consolidating the 1998 and 1999 royalty years into a single proceeding. The Librarian consolidated these years for purposes of the Phase I proceeding without incident, and Phase II proceedings are traditionally less extensive and complicated, thereby making consolidation of multiple royalty years more administratively efficient.
Petitions to Participate must be filed in accordance with the Sec.
351.1(b) of the Judge's regulations. See 37 CFR 351.1(b). Petitions to
Participate submitted by interested parties whose claims do not exceed
$1,000 must contain a statement that the party will not seek a
distribution of more than $1,000. No filing fee is required for these
parties. We note, however, that interested parties with claims
exceeding one thousand dollars ($1,000) must submit a filing fee of one
hundred and fifty dollars ($150) with their Petition to Participate or
it will be rejected. Cash will not be accepted; therefore, parties must
pay the filing fee with a check or money order made payable to the
``Copyright Royalty Board.'' If a check received in payment of the filing fee is returned for lack of sufficient funds, the
[[Page 5597]]
Further procedural matters, including scheduling, will be addressed after Petitions to Participate have been received.
Note that in accordance with 37 CFR 350.2 (Representation), only
attorneys who are members of the bar in one or more states and in good
standing will be allowed to represent parties before the Copyright
Royalty Judges, unless the party is an individual who represents herself or himself.
Dated: January 24, 2008.
James Scott Sledge,
Chief Copyright Royalty Judge.
[FR Doc. E81672 Filed 12908; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 141072P
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT Richard Strasser, Senior Attorney, or Gina Giuffreda, Attorney Advisor, by telephone at (202) 7077658 or e mail at crb@loc.gov.
14 CFR Part 39 40 CFR Part 52 14 CFR Part 71 33 CFR Part 165 50 CFR Part 679 26 CFR Part 1 40 CFR Part 180 47 CFR Part 73 50 CFR Part 17 33 CFR Part 117 44 CFR Part 67 50 CFR Part 648 14 CFR Part 97 33 CFR Part 100 40 CFR Part 63 50 CFR Part 622 26 CFR Part 301 39 CFR Part 111 40 CFR Part 300 50 CFR Part 660 44 CFR Part 65 40 CFR Parts 52 and 81 40 CFR Part 271 47 CFR Part 64 50 CFR Part 665 47 CFR Part 76 50 CFR Part 229 14 CFR Part 23 14 CFR Part 25 21 CFR Part 522