Browse: Departments Dates Agencies
DOCUMENT ID: [Release No. 34-58018; File No. SR-CBOE-2008-62]
SUBJECT CATEGORY: Self-Regulatory Organizations; Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Extend the Quarterly Options Series Pilot Program Until July 10, 2009
DOCUMENT SUMMARY: June 25, 2008.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on June 12, 2008, the Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated
(``Exchange'' or ``CBOE'') filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in
Items I and II below, which Items have been substantially prepared by
the Exchange. The Exchange has designated this proposal as non
controversial under Section 19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \3\ and Rule
19b4(f)(6) thereunder,\4\ which renders the proposed rule change effective upon filing with the
[[Page 38011]]
Commission. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons. \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b4.
\3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
\4\ 17 CFR 240.19b4(f)(6).
I. SelfRegulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change
CBOE proposes to extend for one year an existing pilot program
(``Pilot'') under which the Exchange lists Quarterly Options Series,
which are options series that expire at the close of business on the
last business day of a calendar quarter. The text of the proposed rule
change is available on the Exchange's Web site (http://www.cboe.org/
legal), at the principal office of the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.
II. SelfRegulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements.
A. SelfRegulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
On July 10, 2006, the Exchange filed with the Commission SRCBOE
200665, which was effective on filing.\5\ That proposed rule change
allowed the Exchange to establish a pilot program in which the Exchange
lists Quarterly Options Series. The Exchange subsequently extended the
duration of the Pilot for one year, so that it would expire on July 10,
2008.\6\ On March 3, 2008, the Commission approved a proposed rule
change amending the Pilot to permit the listing of additional series
and to implement a delisting policy for outlying series with no open
interest.\7\ The Exchange hereby proposes to extend the Pilot, as
amended, for an additional year, so that it will expire on July 10,
2009. This proposal does not request any other changes to the Pilot.
\5\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 54123 (July 11, 2006), 71 FR 40558, (July 17, 2006) (SRCBOE200665).
\6\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 56035 (July 10, 2007), 72 FR 38851, (July 16, 2007) (SRCBOE200770).
\7\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 57410 (March 3, 2008), 73 FR 12483 (March 7, 2008) (SRCBOE200796).
In SRCBOE200665, the Exchange stated that it would submit, in connection with any proposed extension of the Pilot, a Pilot Program Report (``Report'') that would provide an analysis of the Pilot covering the entire period during which the Pilot was in effect. The Exchange further stated that the Report would include, at a minimum: (1) Data and written analysis on the open interest and trading volume in the classes for which Quarterly Options Series were opened; (2) an assessment of the appropriateness of the option classes selected for the Pilot; (3) an assessment of the impact of the Pilot on the capacity of CBOE, OPRA, and on market data vendors (to the extent data from market data vendors is available); (4) any capacity problems or other problems that arose during the operation of the Pilot and how CBOE addressed such problems; (5) any complaints that CBOE received during the operation of the Pilot and how CBOE addressed them; and (6) any additional information that would assist in assessing the operation of the Pilot. In connection with SRCBOE200796, the Commission further requested that the Report include analysis of: (1) The impact of the additional series on the Exchange's market and quote capacity, and (2) the implementation and effects of the delisting policy, including the number of series eligible for delisting during the period covered by the report, the number of series actually delisted during that period (pursuant to the delisting policy or otherwise), and documentation of any customer requests to maintain Quarterly Options Series strikes that were otherwise eligible for delisting. The Exchange has submitted, under separate cover, a Report and supplement (``Supplement'') in connection with the present proposed rule change, which Report seeks confidential treatment under the Freedom of Information Act.
The Exchange represents that the Report and Supplement clearly
support CBOE's belief that extension of the Pilot Program is proper.\8\
Among other things, the Exchange represents that the Report and the
Supplement show the strength and efficacy of the Pilot Program on the
Exchange as reflected by the strong volume of Quarterly Options traded
on the Exchange since the Pilot's inception in July 2006. The Exchange
also represents that the Report and the Supplement establish that the
Pilot Program has not created, and in the future should not create,
capacity problems for the Exchange's or OPRA's systems. Moreover, the
Exchange believes that the proposed extension of the Pilot Program will not have an adverse impact on capacity.
\8\ See electronic mail sent June 24, 2008 from Jennifer Yeadon,
Exchange, to Heidi Pilpel, Attorney, Division of Trading and Markets, Commission.
The Exchange believes that shortterm options series increase the
variety of listed options available to investors and provide investors
with a valuable tool to manage risk exposure, minimize capital outlays,
and be more responsive to the timing of events affecting the securities
underlying options contracts. For these reasons, the Exchange believes
the proposed rule change is consistent with Section 6(b) of the Act.\9\
Specifically, the Exchange believes the proposed rule change is
consistent with Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,\10\ which requires that the
rules of an exchange be designed to promote just and equitable
principles of trade, serve to remove impediments to and perfect the
mechanism for a free and open market and a national market system, and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest.
\9\ 15 U.S.C. 78(f)(b).
\10\ 15 U.S.C. 78(f)(b)(5).
B. SelfRegulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
CBOE does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any
burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
C. SelfRegulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others
No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the proposed rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action
The Exchange has designated the proposed rule change as one that:
(1) Does not significantly affect the protection of investors or the
public interest; (2) does not impose any significant burden on
competition; and (3) does not become operative for 30 days from the
date of filing, or such shorter time as the Commission may designate if
consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest.
Therefore, the foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to [[Page 38012]]
Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \11\ and subparagraph (f)(6) of Rule 19b4 thereunder.\12\
\11\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
\12\ 17 CFR 240.19b4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b4(f)(6)(iii)
requires a selfregulatory organization to provide the Commission
with written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change,
along with a brief description and text of the proposed rule change,
at least five business days prior to the date of filing of the
proposed rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission. The Exchange has fulfilled this requirement.
The Exchange has asked the Commission to waive the operative delay
to permit the proposed rule change to become operative prior to the
30th day after filing. The Commission has determined that waiving the
30day operative delay of the Exchange's proposal is consistent with
the protection of investors and the public interest and will promote
competition because such waiver will allow CBOE to continue the
existing Pilot without interruption.\13\ Therefore, the Commission designates the proposal operative upon filing.
\13\ For purposes only of waiving the 30day operative delay,
the Commission has considered the proposed rule's impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule change, the Commission may summarily abrogate the rule change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods:
Electronic Comments
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.\14\
\14\ 17 CFR 200.303(a)(12).
Florence E. Harmon,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. E814922 Filed 7108; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 801001P
SUMMARY: Chicago Board Options Exchange, Inc.,
DOCUMENT BODY 2: June 25, 2008.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on June 12, 2008, the Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated
(``Exchange'' or ``CBOE'') filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in
Items I and II below, which Items have been substantially prepared by
the Exchange. The Exchange has designated this proposal as non
controversial under Section 19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \3\ and Rule
19b4(f)(6) thereunder,\4\ which renders the proposed rule change effective upon filing with the
[[Page 38011]]
Commission. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons. \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b4.
\3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
\4\ 17 CFR 240.19b4(f)(6).
I. SelfRegulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change
CBOE proposes to extend for one year an existing pilot program
(``Pilot'') under which the Exchange lists Quarterly Options Series,
which are options series that expire at the close of business on the
last business day of a calendar quarter. The text of the proposed rule
change is available on the Exchange's Web site (http://www.cboe.org/
legal), at the principal office of the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.
II. SelfRegulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements.
A. SelfRegulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
On July 10, 2006, the Exchange filed with the Commission SRCBOE
200665, which was effective on filing.\5\ That proposed rule change
allowed the Exchange to establish a pilot program in which the Exchange
lists Quarterly Options Series. The Exchange subsequently extended the
duration of the Pilot for one year, so that it would expire on July 10,
2008.\6\ On March 3, 2008, the Commission approved a proposed rule
change amending the Pilot to permit the listing of additional series
and to implement a delisting policy for outlying series with no open
interest.\7\ The Exchange hereby proposes to extend the Pilot, as
amended, for an additional year, so that it will expire on July 10,
2009. This proposal does not request any other changes to the Pilot.
\5\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 54123 (July 11, 2006), 71 FR 40558, (July 17, 2006) (SRCBOE200665).
\6\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 56035 (July 10, 2007), 72 FR 38851, (July 16, 2007) (SRCBOE200770).
\7\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 57410 (March 3, 2008), 73 FR 12483 (March 7, 2008) (SRCBOE200796).
In SRCBOE200665, the Exchange stated that it would submit, in connection with any proposed extension of the Pilot, a Pilot Program Report (``Report'') that would provide an analysis of the Pilot covering the entire period during which the Pilot was in effect. The Exchange further stated that the Report would include, at a minimum: (1) Data and written analysis on the open interest and trading volume in the classes for which Quarterly Options Series were opened; (2) an assessment of the appropriateness of the option classes selected for the Pilot; (3) an assessment of the impact of the Pilot on the capacity of CBOE, OPRA, and on market data vendors (to the extent data from market data vendors is available); (4) any capacity problems or other problems that arose during the operation of the Pilot and how CBOE addressed such problems; (5) any complaints that CBOE received during the operation of the Pilot and how CBOE addressed them; and (6) any additional information that would assist in assessing the operation of the Pilot. In connection with SRCBOE200796, the Commission further requested that the Report include analysis of: (1) The impact of the additional series on the Exchange's market and quote capacity, and (2) the implementation and effects of the delisting policy, including the number of series eligible for delisting during the period covered by the report, the number of series actually delisted during that period (pursuant to the delisting policy or otherwise), and documentation of any customer requests to maintain Quarterly Options Series strikes that were otherwise eligible for delisting. The Exchange has submitted, under separate cover, a Report and supplement (``Supplement'') in connection with the present proposed rule change, which Report seeks confidential treatment under the Freedom of Information Act.
The Exchange represents that the Report and Supplement clearly
support CBOE's belief that extension of the Pilot Program is proper.\8\
Among other things, the Exchange represents that the Report and the
Supplement show the strength and efficacy of the Pilot Program on the
Exchange as reflected by the strong volume of Quarterly Options traded
on the Exchange since the Pilot's inception in July 2006. The Exchange
also represents that the Report and the Supplement establish that the
Pilot Program has not created, and in the future should not create,
capacity problems for the Exchange's or OPRA's systems. Moreover, the
Exchange believes that the proposed extension of the Pilot Program will not have an adverse impact on capacity.
\8\ See electronic mail sent June 24, 2008 from Jennifer Yeadon,
Exchange, to Heidi Pilpel, Attorney, Division of Trading and Markets, Commission.
The Exchange believes that shortterm options series increase the
variety of listed options available to investors and provide investors
with a valuable tool to manage risk exposure, minimize capital outlays,
and be more responsive to the timing of events affecting the securities
underlying options contracts. For these reasons, the Exchange believes
the proposed rule change is consistent with Section 6(b) of the Act.\9\
Specifically, the Exchange believes the proposed rule change is
consistent with Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,\10\ which requires that the
rules of an exchange be designed to promote just and equitable
principles of trade, serve to remove impediments to and perfect the
mechanism for a free and open market and a national market system, and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest.
\9\ 15 U.S.C. 78(f)(b).
\10\ 15 U.S.C. 78(f)(b)(5).
B. SelfRegulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
CBOE does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any
burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
C. SelfRegulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others
No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the proposed rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action
The Exchange has designated the proposed rule change as one that:
(1) Does not significantly affect the protection of investors or the
public interest; (2) does not impose any significant burden on
competition; and (3) does not become operative for 30 days from the
date of filing, or such shorter time as the Commission may designate if
consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest.
Therefore, the foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to [[Page 38012]]
Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \11\ and subparagraph (f)(6) of Rule 19b4 thereunder.\12\
\11\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
\12\ 17 CFR 240.19b4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b4(f)(6)(iii)
requires a selfregulatory organization to provide the Commission
with written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change,
along with a brief description and text of the proposed rule change,
at least five business days prior to the date of filing of the
proposed rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission. The Exchange has fulfilled this requirement.
The Exchange has asked the Commission to waive the operative delay
to permit the proposed rule change to become operative prior to the
30th day after filing. The Commission has determined that waiving the
30day operative delay of the Exchange's proposal is consistent with
the protection of investors and the public interest and will promote
competition because such waiver will allow CBOE to continue the
existing Pilot without interruption.\13\ Therefore, the Commission designates the proposal operative upon filing.
\13\ For purposes only of waiving the 30day operative delay,
the Commission has considered the proposed rule's impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule change, the Commission may summarily abrogate the rule change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods:
Electronic Comments
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.\14\
\14\ 17 CFR 200.303(a)(12).
Florence E. Harmon,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. E814922 Filed 7108; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 801001P
14 CFR Part 39 40 CFR Part 52 14 CFR Part 71 33 CFR Part 165 50 CFR Part 679 47 CFR Part 73 26 CFR Part 1 40 CFR Part 180 33 CFR Part 117 50 CFR Part 17 44 CFR Part 67 50 CFR Part 648 14 CFR Part 97 33 CFR Part 100 40 CFR Part 63 50 CFR Part 622 44 CFR Part 65 50 CFR Part 660 26 CFR Part 301 39 CFR Part 111 40 CFR Part 300 6 CFR Part 5 40 CFR Part 271 47 CFR Part 64 40 CFR Parts 52 and 81 50 CFR Part 665 44 CFR Part 64 10 CFR Part 50 49 CFR Part 571 47 CFR Part 76