Browse: Departments Dates Agencies
DOCUMENT ID: [Release No. 34-58029; File No. SR-NASDAQ-2008-053]
SUBJECT CATEGORY: Self-Regulatory Organizations; The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change To Modify the Definition of ``Independent Director''
DOCUMENT SUMMARY: June 26, 2008.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on June 6, 2008, The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC (``Nasdaq''), filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (``SEC'' or ``Commission'') the
proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, and III below, which
Items have been substantially prepared by Nasdaq. The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b4.
I. SelfRegulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change
Nasdaq proposes to amend Rule 4200(a)(15)(B) and IM4200 to modify Nasdaq's definition of ``independent director.'' Nasdaq will implement the proposed rule upon approval.
The text of the proposed rule change is available at Nasdaq, at the
Commission's Public Reference Room, and on Nasdaq's Web site at http:// nasdaq.complinet.com.
II. SelfRegulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, Nasdaq included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. Nasdaq has prepared summaries, set forth in Sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements. A. SelfRegulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
The purpose of this rule filing is to modify Nasdaq's definition of an ``independent director.''
Nasdaq's rules generally preclude a director from being considered
independent if the director has received more than $100,000 in
compensation from the issuer.\3\ When Nasdaq first adopted this rule in
1999, the threshold was $60,000, which was chosen to be consistent with
the $60,000 disclosure threshold set by the Commission in Regulation S
K, Item 404.\4\ In August 2006, the Commission adopted final rules
raising the threshold in Regulation SK, Item 404 from $60,000 to
$120,000.\5\ Following this change to the SEC's rules, Nasdaq, as an
intermediate step, increased the threshold in its independence
definition from $60,000 to $100,000,\6\ which was consistent with the
threshold in the comparable rule of the New York Stock Exchange, Inc. (``NYSE'').\7\
\3\ Nasdaq Rule 4200(a)(15)(B).
\4\ The rule filing stated that ``* * * Nasdaq believes that a
compensation threshold of $60,000 is appropriate as it corresponds
to the de minimis threshold for disclosure of relationships that may
affect the independent judgment of directors set forth in SEC
Regulation SK, Item 404.'' See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 41982 (October 6, 1999), 64 FR 55510 (October 13, 1999).
\5\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 54302A (August 29, 2006), 71 FR 53158 (September 8, 2006).
\6\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 55463 (March 13, 2007), 72 FR 13327 (March 21, 2007).
\7\ See Section 303A.02(b)(ii) of the NYSE Listed Company Manual.
On June 8, 2007, NYSE amended a prior rule proposal filed with the
Commission regarding changes to certain of its corporate governance
requirements.\8\ In the amendment, NYSE proposed increasing the
threshold in its independence definition from $100,000 to $120,000. In
its statement of the purpose of its proposal, NYSE explained that
``[t]his change reflects the SEC's recent amendment to the dollar
threshold applicable to related party transactions that must be disclosed under Item 404 of Regulation SK.'' \9\
\8\ See Amendment No. 1 to File No. SRNYSE200581.
\9\ Id., citing Securities Act Release No. 8732A (August 29, 2006), 71 FR 53158 (September 8, 2006).
Nasdaq believes that the monetary threshold in its independence
definition should be consistent with the amount in Regulation SK, Item
404. Using a consistent standard would enhance Nasdaq's ability to
assess compliance with the independent director requirements because
companies are required to disclose compensation in excess of $120,000,
but are not necessarily required to disclose compensation between
$100,000 and $120,000. Finally, Nasdaq believes that its rules and the
NYSE rules should be consistent with regard to the definition [[Page 38017]]
of an independent director. As such, and given that Nasdaq's objective
has always been to make its independence threshold consistent with the
SEC's disclosure threshold in Regulation SK, Item 404, Nasdaq is
proposing to increase its independence threshold from $100,000 to $120,000.
Nasdaq believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with
the provisions of Section 6 of the Act,\10\ in general, and with
Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,\11\ in particular. Section 6(b)(5) of the
Act requires, among other things, that Nasdaq's rules be designed to
prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just
and equitable principles of trade, to remove impediments to and perfect
the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system
and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest. The
proposed change is consistent with these requirements in that it will
conform Nasdaq's requirement to SEC disclosure requirements and
proposed NYSE rule changes, and provide a standard that is clear,
straightforward, and easy for issuers to understand and apply. \10\ 15 U.S.C. 78f.
\11\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
B. SelfRegulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
Nasdaq does not believe that the proposed rule change will result
in any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act, as amended.
C. SelfRegulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
Written comments were neither solicited nor received. III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action
Within 35 days of the date of publication of this notice in the
Federal Register or within such longer period (i) as the Commission may
designate up to 90 days of such date if it finds such longer period to
be appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding, or (ii) as to which Nasdaq consents, the Commission will:
(A) By order approve such proposed rule change, or
(B) Institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule change should be disapproved.
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods:
Electronic Comments
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.\12\
\12\ 17 CFR 200.303(a)(12).
Florence E. Harmon,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. E814983 Filed 7108; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 801001P
SUMMARY: NASDAQ Stock Market LLC,
DOCUMENT BODY 2: June 26, 2008.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on June 6, 2008, The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC (``Nasdaq''), filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (``SEC'' or ``Commission'') the
proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, and III below, which
Items have been substantially prepared by Nasdaq. The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b4.
I. SelfRegulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change
Nasdaq proposes to amend Rule 4200(a)(15)(B) and IM4200 to modify Nasdaq's definition of ``independent director.'' Nasdaq will implement the proposed rule upon approval.
The text of the proposed rule change is available at Nasdaq, at the
Commission's Public Reference Room, and on Nasdaq's Web site at http:// nasdaq.complinet.com.
II. SelfRegulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, Nasdaq included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. Nasdaq has prepared summaries, set forth in Sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements. A. SelfRegulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
The purpose of this rule filing is to modify Nasdaq's definition of an ``independent director.''
Nasdaq's rules generally preclude a director from being considered
independent if the director has received more than $100,000 in
compensation from the issuer.\3\ When Nasdaq first adopted this rule in
1999, the threshold was $60,000, which was chosen to be consistent with
the $60,000 disclosure threshold set by the Commission in Regulation S
K, Item 404.\4\ In August 2006, the Commission adopted final rules
raising the threshold in Regulation SK, Item 404 from $60,000 to
$120,000.\5\ Following this change to the SEC's rules, Nasdaq, as an
intermediate step, increased the threshold in its independence
definition from $60,000 to $100,000,\6\ which was consistent with the
threshold in the comparable rule of the New York Stock Exchange, Inc. (``NYSE'').\7\
\3\ Nasdaq Rule 4200(a)(15)(B).
\4\ The rule filing stated that ``* * * Nasdaq believes that a
compensation threshold of $60,000 is appropriate as it corresponds
to the de minimis threshold for disclosure of relationships that may
affect the independent judgment of directors set forth in SEC
Regulation SK, Item 404.'' See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 41982 (October 6, 1999), 64 FR 55510 (October 13, 1999).
\5\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 54302A (August 29, 2006), 71 FR 53158 (September 8, 2006).
\6\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 55463 (March 13, 2007), 72 FR 13327 (March 21, 2007).
\7\ See Section 303A.02(b)(ii) of the NYSE Listed Company Manual.
On June 8, 2007, NYSE amended a prior rule proposal filed with the
Commission regarding changes to certain of its corporate governance
requirements.\8\ In the amendment, NYSE proposed increasing the
threshold in its independence definition from $100,000 to $120,000. In
its statement of the purpose of its proposal, NYSE explained that
``[t]his change reflects the SEC's recent amendment to the dollar
threshold applicable to related party transactions that must be disclosed under Item 404 of Regulation SK.'' \9\
\8\ See Amendment No. 1 to File No. SRNYSE200581.
\9\ Id., citing Securities Act Release No. 8732A (August 29, 2006), 71 FR 53158 (September 8, 2006).
Nasdaq believes that the monetary threshold in its independence
definition should be consistent with the amount in Regulation SK, Item
404. Using a consistent standard would enhance Nasdaq's ability to
assess compliance with the independent director requirements because
companies are required to disclose compensation in excess of $120,000,
but are not necessarily required to disclose compensation between
$100,000 and $120,000. Finally, Nasdaq believes that its rules and the
NYSE rules should be consistent with regard to the definition [[Page 38017]]
of an independent director. As such, and given that Nasdaq's objective
has always been to make its independence threshold consistent with the
SEC's disclosure threshold in Regulation SK, Item 404, Nasdaq is
proposing to increase its independence threshold from $100,000 to $120,000.
Nasdaq believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with
the provisions of Section 6 of the Act,\10\ in general, and with
Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,\11\ in particular. Section 6(b)(5) of the
Act requires, among other things, that Nasdaq's rules be designed to
prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just
and equitable principles of trade, to remove impediments to and perfect
the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system
and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest. The
proposed change is consistent with these requirements in that it will
conform Nasdaq's requirement to SEC disclosure requirements and
proposed NYSE rule changes, and provide a standard that is clear,
straightforward, and easy for issuers to understand and apply. \10\ 15 U.S.C. 78f.
\11\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
B. SelfRegulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
Nasdaq does not believe that the proposed rule change will result
in any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act, as amended.
C. SelfRegulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
Written comments were neither solicited nor received. III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action
Within 35 days of the date of publication of this notice in the
Federal Register or within such longer period (i) as the Commission may
designate up to 90 days of such date if it finds such longer period to
be appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding, or (ii) as to which Nasdaq consents, the Commission will:
(A) By order approve such proposed rule change, or
(B) Institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule change should be disapproved.
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods:
Electronic Comments
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.\12\
\12\ 17 CFR 200.303(a)(12).
Florence E. Harmon,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. E814983 Filed 7108; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 801001P
14 CFR Part 39 40 CFR Part 52 14 CFR Part 71 33 CFR Part 165 50 CFR Part 679 47 CFR Part 73 26 CFR Part 1 40 CFR Part 180 33 CFR Part 117 50 CFR Part 17 44 CFR Part 67 50 CFR Part 648 14 CFR Part 97 33 CFR Part 100 40 CFR Part 63 50 CFR Part 622 44 CFR Part 65 50 CFR Part 660 26 CFR Part 301 39 CFR Part 111 40 CFR Part 300 6 CFR Part 5 40 CFR Part 271 47 CFR Part 64 40 CFR Parts 52 and 81 50 CFR Part 665 44 CFR Part 64 10 CFR Part 50 49 CFR Part 571 47 CFR Part 76