Browse: Departments Dates Agencies
DOCUMENT ID: [Release No. 34-58037; File No. SR-Amex-2008-50]
SUBJECT CATEGORY: Self-Regulatory Organizations; American Stock Exchange LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Establish a Pilot Program That Reduces the Minimum Number of Contracts Required for a FLEX Equity Option Opening Transaction in a New Series and To Modify the Minimum Value Size for an Opening Transaction in a Currently-Opened FLEX Equity Series
DOCUMENT SUMMARY: June 26, 2008.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on June 19, 2008, the American Stock Exchange LLC (``Amex'' or
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I and
II below, which Items have been substantially prepared by Amex. The
Exchange filed the proposal as a ``noncontroversial'' rule change
pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \3\ and Rule 19b
4(f)(6) thereunder,\4\ which renders the proposal effective upon
receipt of this filing by the Commission. The Commission is publishing
this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b4.
\3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
\4\ 17 CFR 240.19b4(f)(6).
I. SelfRegulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change
The Amex proposes to establish a pilot program that reduces the minimum number of contracts required for a FLEX Equity Option opening transaction in a new series (``Pilot Program'') and to modify the minimum value size for an opening transaction in a currentlyopened FLEX Equity Option series. The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Amex's Web site at http://www.amex.com, the Office of the Secretary, the Amex and at the Commission's Public Reference Room. II. SelfRegulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Amex included statements concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. The Amex has prepared summaries, set forth in Sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements. A. SelfRegulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
The purpose of the proposed rule change is to initiate a year and a
half long Pilot Program that would reduce the minimum value size for an
opening transaction (other than FLEX Quotes responsive to a FLEX
Request for Quotes (``RFQ'')) \5\ in any FLEX Equity Option \6\ series
in which there is no open interest at the time the RFQ is submitted,
and to modify the minimum value size for an opening transaction in a
currentlyopened FLEX Equity series (other than FLEX Quotes responsive
to a FLEX RFQ). The proposed amendments to the criteria for opening
FLEX option transactions should provide members that use FLEX Equity
Options greater flexibility in structuring the terms of such options to
better comport with the particular needs of the members and their customers.
\5\ FLEX Quotes responsive to a FLEX Request for Quote (``RFQ'')
have different parameters that are not changed by this filing. See Amex Rule 903G(a)(4)(iv).
\6\ FLEX Equity Options are flexible exchangetraded options
contracts that overlie equity securities. FLEX Equity Options
provide investors with the ability to customize basic option
features including size, expiration date, exercise style, and
certain exercise prices. FLEX Equity Options may have a maximum term of five (5) years. See Amex Rule 903G(a)(2) and (4).
Currently, Amex Rule 903G(a)(4)(ii) sets the minimum opening
transaction value size in the case of a FLEX Equity Option in a newly
established series as the lesser of (i) 250 contracts or (ii) the
number of contracts overlying $1 million in the underlying securities.\7\
[[Page 38009]]
Under the Pilot Program, the Exchange proposes to reduce the ``250
contracts'' component to ``150 contracts;'' the $1 million underlying
value component will continue to apply unchanged.\8\ The proposed Pilot
Program would be similar to pilot programs that already exist at other options exchanges.\9\
\7\ Under this formula, an opening transaction in a FLEX Equity
series in a stock priced at $40 or more would reach the $1 million
limit before it would reach the contract size limit, i.e., 250
contracts times the multiplier (100) times the stock price ($40)
equals $1 million in underlying value. For a FLEX Equity series in a
stock priced at less than $40, the 250 contract size limit applies.
\8\ Under this proposed formula, an opening transaction in a
FLEX Equity series in a stock priced at approximately $66.67 or more
would reach the $1 million limit before it would reach the contract
size limit, i.e., 150 contracts times the multiplier (100) times the
stock price ($66.67) equals just over $1 million in underlying
value. For a FLEX Equity series in a stock priced at less than $66.67, the 150 contract size limit would apply.
\9\ See, for example, Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 57429
(March 4, 2008), 73 FR 13058 (March 11, 2008) (SRCBOE200636) and
57824 (May 15, 2008), 73 FR 29805 (May 22, 2008) (SRPhlx200835).
Given that FLEX Equity Option transactions can occur in increments
of 100 or more contracts in subsequent opening transactions,\10\ the
Exchange believes it is reasonable to permit the initial series opening
transaction size to be 150 contracts (or $1 million in underlying
value, whichever is less). The Exchange believes that the proposed
reduction of the minimum value size for opening a series provides FLEX
participating members and their customers with greater flexibility in
structuring the terms of FLEX Equity Options to better suit the FLEX traders' particular needs.
\10\ Specifically, for FLEX Equity Options the minimum value
size for a transaction in any currentlyopened FLEX series is, as
proposed, the lesser of 100 contracts or the number of contracts
overlying $1 million in the underlying securities; or the lesser of
25 contracts or the remaining size in the case of a closing
transaction. Additionally, the minimum value size for a FLEX Quote
entered in response to a RFQ in FLEX Equity Options is the lesser of
25 contracts or the remaining size in a closing transaction. See Amex Rule 903G(a)(4)(iii) and (iv).
The Exchange notes that the opening size requirement for FLEX
Equity Options was originally put in place to limit participation in
FLEX Equity Options to sophisticated, high net worth investors rather
than retail investors.\11\ The Exchange has recently received requests
from brokerdealers representing institutional clients that the minimum
value size for opening transactions be reduced. In proposing the
reduction of the 250 contract component to 150 contracts, the Amex (as
was the case with the CBOE) is aware of the desire to continue to
provide both the requisite amount of investor protection that the
minimum opening size requirement was originally designed to achieve, as
well as the need for market participants to have the flexibility to serve their customers' particular investment needs.\12\
\11\ The existing customer base for FLEX Options includes both institutional investors and high net worth individuals.
The Exchange believes that modifying the minimum opening transaction value size in this way will further broaden the base of institutional investors that use FLEX Equity Options to manage their trading and investment risk, including investors that currently trade in the overthecounter (``OTC'') market for customized options which can take on contract characteristics similar to FLEX Options but for which similar opening size restrictions do not apply. The Exchange believes that market participants benefit from being able to trade these customized options in an exchange environment in several ways, including, but not limited to, enhanced efficiency in initiating and closing out positions; increased market transparency; and heightened contraparty creditworthiness due to the role of The Options Clearing Corporation as issuer and guarantor of FLEX Equity Options.
Should the Exchange desire to propose an extension, expansion, or
permanent approval of the Pilot Program, the Exchange would submit,
along with a filing proposing any necessary amendments to the Pilot
Program, a pilot program report. The report would be submitted to the
Commission at least ninety days prior to the expiration date of the
oneandahalf year Pilot Program. At a minimum, the report would
provide (i) data and analysis on the open interest and trading volume
in FLEX Equity Options for which series were opened with a minimum
opening size of 150 to 249 contracts and less than $1 million in
underlying value; and (ii) analysis on the types of investors that initiated opening FLEX Equity Options transactions (i.e.,
institutional, high net worth, or retail, if any).\13\
\13\ Telephone conference between Jeffrey P. Burns, Vice
President and Associate General Counsel, Amex, and Kristie Diemer,
Special Counsel, Division of Trading and Markets, Commission, on June 25, 2008.
The report should provide the Commission with information on whether the intended customers (institutional and high net worth) are in fact the investors utilizing the lower opening contract requirement in the FLEX Equity Options market, as well as whether the lower opening size has increased liquidity in FLEX Equity Options.\14\ Based on the report's information, the Commission should be able to determine whether the Pilot Program should be extended or approved on a permanent basis, consistent with the Act.
Finally, the Exchange is also proposing to modify the minimum value
size for an opening transaction in a currentlyopened FLEX Equity
series (other than FLEX Quotes responsive to a FLEX RFQ). Presently,
Amex Rule 903G(a)(4)(iii) sets the minimum transaction value size for
an opening transaction in a currentlyopened series at 100 contracts.
The Exchange is proposing to modify the minimum size formula to the
lesser of (i) 100 contracts or (ii) the number of contracts overlying
$1 million in the underlying securities. This change would only impact
those FLEX Equity series in which the underlying stock is trading at more than $100.\15\
\15\ Under this proposed formula, a transaction in a currently
opened FLEX Equity series in a stock priced at more than $100 would
reach the $1 million limit before it would reach the contract size
limit, i.e., 100 contracts times the multiplier (100) times the stock price ($100) equals $1 million in underlying value.
The FLEX minimum size requirements for subsequent opening transactions in a currentlyopened series is higher for certain stocks priced over $100 than the minimum size needed to initially open the series in similarly priced stocks. The Exchange therefore believes that this proposal is necessary for there to be consistency between the minimum size requirements for new series and currentlyopened series when the underlying stock is trading at more than $100.\16\ \16\ For example, a new FLEX Equity series in a stock trading at $110 could open with an initial transaction size of 91 contracts, i.e., 91 contracts times the multiplier (100) times the stock price ($110) equals just over $1 million in underlying value. Once the series is opened, absent the proposed change, any further opening transactions would require a minimum contract size of 100 contracts, despite the fact that with the stock price of $110, this would be valued at $1.1 million, more than the value of the initial opening transaction.
The proposed rule change is consistent with Section 6(b) of the Act
in general and furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(5) \17\ in
particular in that the Exchange's proposed rules are designed to
promote just and equitable principles of trade, to remove impediments
to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national
market system and, in general, to protect investors and the public
interest. Specifically, the Exchange believes that reducing the minimum
value sizes for certain opening transactions in FLEX Equity [[Page 38010]]
Options series thereby providing FLEXparticipating members and their
customers greater flexibility to trade FLEX Equity Options will benefit the marketplace and market participants.
\17\ 15 U.S.C. 78(f)(b)(5).
B. SelfRegulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The proposed rule change will impose no burden on competition that
is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
C. SelfRegulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were solicited or received by the Exchange on this proposal.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action
Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not: (A)
Significantly affect the protection of investors or the public
interest; (B) impose any significant burden on competition; and (C) by
its terms, become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was
filed, or such shorter time as the Commission may designate, if
consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest, it
has become effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \18\ and Rule 19b4(f)(6) thereunder.\19\
\18\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
\19\ 17 CFR 240.19b4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b4(f)(6)(iii) requires that a selfregulatory organization submit to the
Commission written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule
change, along with a brief description and text of the proposed rule
change, at least five business days prior to the date of filing of
the proposed rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the
Commission. The Commission notes that Amex has satisfied the five day prefiling notice requirement.
A proposed rule change filed under Rule 19b4(f)(6) normally may not become operative prior to 30 days after the date of filing. However, Rule 19b4(f)(6)(iii) permits the Commission to designate a shorter time if such action is consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest. The Exchange has requested that the Commission waive the 30day operative delay and designate the proposed rule change immediately operative, so that the Exchange can implement the rule change, which is substantially similar to proposals recently implemented at other exchanges, without delay. The Amex believes that waiving the 30day operative delay is consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest for competitive reasons, and because the proposal raises no new or controversial issues.
The Commission notes that the Amex proposal is substantially
similar to the CBOE Pilot Program which was published for comment in
the Federal Register. No comments were received on CBOE's proposal, and
the Amex proposal raises no new or novel issues. Based on this, the
Commission believes that waiving the 30day operative delay is
consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest.
Therefore, the Commission designates the proposed rule change to be operative upon filing.\20\
\20\ For purposes only of waiving the 30day operative delay,
the Commission has considered the proposed rule's impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
At any time within 60 days of the filing of such proposed rule change, the Commission may summarily abrogate such rule change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods:
Electronic Comments
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.\21\
\21\ 17 CFR 200.303(a)(12).
Florence E. Harmon,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. E815002 Filed 7108; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 801001P
SUMMARY: American Stock Exchange LLC,
DOCUMENT BODY 2: June 26, 2008.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on June 19, 2008, the American Stock Exchange LLC (``Amex'' or
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I and
II below, which Items have been substantially prepared by Amex. The
Exchange filed the proposal as a ``noncontroversial'' rule change
pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \3\ and Rule 19b
4(f)(6) thereunder,\4\ which renders the proposal effective upon
receipt of this filing by the Commission. The Commission is publishing
this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b4.
\3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
\4\ 17 CFR 240.19b4(f)(6).
I. SelfRegulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change
The Amex proposes to establish a pilot program that reduces the minimum number of contracts required for a FLEX Equity Option opening transaction in a new series (``Pilot Program'') and to modify the minimum value size for an opening transaction in a currentlyopened FLEX Equity Option series. The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Amex's Web site at http://www.amex.com, the Office of the Secretary, the Amex and at the Commission's Public Reference Room. II. SelfRegulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Amex included statements concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. The Amex has prepared summaries, set forth in Sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements. A. SelfRegulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
The purpose of the proposed rule change is to initiate a year and a
half long Pilot Program that would reduce the minimum value size for an
opening transaction (other than FLEX Quotes responsive to a FLEX
Request for Quotes (``RFQ'')) \5\ in any FLEX Equity Option \6\ series
in which there is no open interest at the time the RFQ is submitted,
and to modify the minimum value size for an opening transaction in a
currentlyopened FLEX Equity series (other than FLEX Quotes responsive
to a FLEX RFQ). The proposed amendments to the criteria for opening
FLEX option transactions should provide members that use FLEX Equity
Options greater flexibility in structuring the terms of such options to
better comport with the particular needs of the members and their customers.
\5\ FLEX Quotes responsive to a FLEX Request for Quote (``RFQ'')
have different parameters that are not changed by this filing. See Amex Rule 903G(a)(4)(iv).
\6\ FLEX Equity Options are flexible exchangetraded options
contracts that overlie equity securities. FLEX Equity Options
provide investors with the ability to customize basic option
features including size, expiration date, exercise style, and
certain exercise prices. FLEX Equity Options may have a maximum term of five (5) years. See Amex Rule 903G(a)(2) and (4).
Currently, Amex Rule 903G(a)(4)(ii) sets the minimum opening
transaction value size in the case of a FLEX Equity Option in a newly
established series as the lesser of (i) 250 contracts or (ii) the
number of contracts overlying $1 million in the underlying securities.\7\
[[Page 38009]]
Under the Pilot Program, the Exchange proposes to reduce the ``250
contracts'' component to ``150 contracts;'' the $1 million underlying
value component will continue to apply unchanged.\8\ The proposed Pilot
Program would be similar to pilot programs that already exist at other options exchanges.\9\
\7\ Under this formula, an opening transaction in a FLEX Equity
series in a stock priced at $40 or more would reach the $1 million
limit before it would reach the contract size limit, i.e., 250
contracts times the multiplier (100) times the stock price ($40)
equals $1 million in underlying value. For a FLEX Equity series in a
stock priced at less than $40, the 250 contract size limit applies.
\8\ Under this proposed formula, an opening transaction in a
FLEX Equity series in a stock priced at approximately $66.67 or more
would reach the $1 million limit before it would reach the contract
size limit, i.e., 150 contracts times the multiplier (100) times the
stock price ($66.67) equals just over $1 million in underlying
value. For a FLEX Equity series in a stock priced at less than $66.67, the 150 contract size limit would apply.
\9\ See, for example, Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 57429
(March 4, 2008), 73 FR 13058 (March 11, 2008) (SRCBOE200636) and
57824 (May 15, 2008), 73 FR 29805 (May 22, 2008) (SRPhlx200835).
Given that FLEX Equity Option transactions can occur in increments
of 100 or more contracts in subsequent opening transactions,\10\ the
Exchange believes it is reasonable to permit the initial series opening
transaction size to be 150 contracts (or $1 million in underlying
value, whichever is less). The Exchange believes that the proposed
reduction of the minimum value size for opening a series provides FLEX
participating members and their customers with greater flexibility in
structuring the terms of FLEX Equity Options to better suit the FLEX traders' particular needs.
\10\ Specifically, for FLEX Equity Options the minimum value
size for a transaction in any currentlyopened FLEX series is, as
proposed, the lesser of 100 contracts or the number of contracts
overlying $1 million in the underlying securities; or the lesser of
25 contracts or the remaining size in the case of a closing
transaction. Additionally, the minimum value size for a FLEX Quote
entered in response to a RFQ in FLEX Equity Options is the lesser of
25 contracts or the remaining size in a closing transaction. See Amex Rule 903G(a)(4)(iii) and (iv).
The Exchange notes that the opening size requirement for FLEX
Equity Options was originally put in place to limit participation in
FLEX Equity Options to sophisticated, high net worth investors rather
than retail investors.\11\ The Exchange has recently received requests
from brokerdealers representing institutional clients that the minimum
value size for opening transactions be reduced. In proposing the
reduction of the 250 contract component to 150 contracts, the Amex (as
was the case with the CBOE) is aware of the desire to continue to
provide both the requisite amount of investor protection that the
minimum opening size requirement was originally designed to achieve, as
well as the need for market participants to have the flexibility to serve their customers' particular investment needs.\12\
\11\ The existing customer base for FLEX Options includes both institutional investors and high net worth individuals.
The Exchange believes that modifying the minimum opening transaction value size in this way will further broaden the base of institutional investors that use FLEX Equity Options to manage their trading and investment risk, including investors that currently trade in the overthecounter (``OTC'') market for customized options which can take on contract characteristics similar to FLEX Options but for which similar opening size restrictions do not apply. The Exchange believes that market participants benefit from being able to trade these customized options in an exchange environment in several ways, including, but not limited to, enhanced efficiency in initiating and closing out positions; increased market transparency; and heightened contraparty creditworthiness due to the role of The Options Clearing Corporation as issuer and guarantor of FLEX Equity Options.
Should the Exchange desire to propose an extension, expansion, or
permanent approval of the Pilot Program, the Exchange would submit,
along with a filing proposing any necessary amendments to the Pilot
Program, a pilot program report. The report would be submitted to the
Commission at least ninety days prior to the expiration date of the
oneandahalf year Pilot Program. At a minimum, the report would
provide (i) data and analysis on the open interest and trading volume
in FLEX Equity Options for which series were opened with a minimum
opening size of 150 to 249 contracts and less than $1 million in
underlying value; and (ii) analysis on the types of investors that initiated opening FLEX Equity Options transactions (i.e.,
institutional, high net worth, or retail, if any).\13\
\13\ Telephone conference between Jeffrey P. Burns, Vice
President and Associate General Counsel, Amex, and Kristie Diemer,
Special Counsel, Division of Trading and Markets, Commission, on June 25, 2008.
The report should provide the Commission with information on whether the intended customers (institutional and high net worth) are in fact the investors utilizing the lower opening contract requirement in the FLEX Equity Options market, as well as whether the lower opening size has increased liquidity in FLEX Equity Options.\14\ Based on the report's information, the Commission should be able to determine whether the Pilot Program should be extended or approved on a permanent basis, consistent with the Act.
Finally, the Exchange is also proposing to modify the minimum value
size for an opening transaction in a currentlyopened FLEX Equity
series (other than FLEX Quotes responsive to a FLEX RFQ). Presently,
Amex Rule 903G(a)(4)(iii) sets the minimum transaction value size for
an opening transaction in a currentlyopened series at 100 contracts.
The Exchange is proposing to modify the minimum size formula to the
lesser of (i) 100 contracts or (ii) the number of contracts overlying
$1 million in the underlying securities. This change would only impact
those FLEX Equity series in which the underlying stock is trading at more than $100.\15\
\15\ Under this proposed formula, a transaction in a currently
opened FLEX Equity series in a stock priced at more than $100 would
reach the $1 million limit before it would reach the contract size
limit, i.e., 100 contracts times the multiplier (100) times the stock price ($100) equals $1 million in underlying value.
The FLEX minimum size requirements for subsequent opening transactions in a currentlyopened series is higher for certain stocks priced over $100 than the minimum size needed to initially open the series in similarly priced stocks. The Exchange therefore believes that this proposal is necessary for there to be consistency between the minimum size requirements for new series and currentlyopened series when the underlying stock is trading at more than $100.\16\ \16\ For example, a new FLEX Equity series in a stock trading at $110 could open with an initial transaction size of 91 contracts, i.e., 91 contracts times the multiplier (100) times the stock price ($110) equals just over $1 million in underlying value. Once the series is opened, absent the proposed change, any further opening transactions would require a minimum contract size of 100 contracts, despite the fact that with the stock price of $110, this would be valued at $1.1 million, more than the value of the initial opening transaction.
The proposed rule change is consistent with Section 6(b) of the Act
in general and furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(5) \17\ in
particular in that the Exchange's proposed rules are designed to
promote just and equitable principles of trade, to remove impediments
to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national
market system and, in general, to protect investors and the public
interest. Specifically, the Exchange believes that reducing the minimum
value sizes for certain opening transactions in FLEX Equity [[Page 38010]]
Options series thereby providing FLEXparticipating members and their
customers greater flexibility to trade FLEX Equity Options will benefit the marketplace and market participants.
\17\ 15 U.S.C. 78(f)(b)(5).
B. SelfRegulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The proposed rule change will impose no burden on competition that
is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
C. SelfRegulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were solicited or received by the Exchange on this proposal.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action
Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not: (A)
Significantly affect the protection of investors or the public
interest; (B) impose any significant burden on competition; and (C) by
its terms, become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was
filed, or such shorter time as the Commission may designate, if
consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest, it
has become effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \18\ and Rule 19b4(f)(6) thereunder.\19\
\18\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
\19\ 17 CFR 240.19b4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b4(f)(6)(iii) requires that a selfregulatory organization submit to the
Commission written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule
change, along with a brief description and text of the proposed rule
change, at least five business days prior to the date of filing of
the proposed rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the
Commission. The Commission notes that Amex has satisfied the five day prefiling notice requirement.
A proposed rule change filed under Rule 19b4(f)(6) normally may not become operative prior to 30 days after the date of filing. However, Rule 19b4(f)(6)(iii) permits the Commission to designate a shorter time if such action is consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest. The Exchange has requested that the Commission waive the 30day operative delay and designate the proposed rule change immediately operative, so that the Exchange can implement the rule change, which is substantially similar to proposals recently implemented at other exchanges, without delay. The Amex believes that waiving the 30day operative delay is consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest for competitive reasons, and because the proposal raises no new or controversial issues.
The Commission notes that the Amex proposal is substantially
similar to the CBOE Pilot Program which was published for comment in
the Federal Register. No comments were received on CBOE's proposal, and
the Amex proposal raises no new or novel issues. Based on this, the
Commission believes that waiving the 30day operative delay is
consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest.
Therefore, the Commission designates the proposed rule change to be operative upon filing.\20\
\20\ For purposes only of waiving the 30day operative delay,
the Commission has considered the proposed rule's impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
At any time within 60 days of the filing of such proposed rule change, the Commission may summarily abrogate such rule change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods:
Electronic Comments
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.\21\
\21\ 17 CFR 200.303(a)(12).
Florence E. Harmon,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. E815002 Filed 7108; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 801001P
14 CFR Part 39 40 CFR Part 52 14 CFR Part 71 33 CFR Part 165 50 CFR Part 679 47 CFR Part 73 26 CFR Part 1 40 CFR Part 180 33 CFR Part 117 50 CFR Part 17 44 CFR Part 67 50 CFR Part 648 14 CFR Part 97 33 CFR Part 100 40 CFR Part 63 50 CFR Part 622 44 CFR Part 65 50 CFR Part 660 26 CFR Part 301 39 CFR Part 111 40 CFR Part 300 6 CFR Part 5 40 CFR Part 271 47 CFR Part 64 40 CFR Parts 52 and 81 50 CFR Part 665 44 CFR Part 64 10 CFR Part 50 49 CFR Part 571 47 CFR Part 76