Browse: Departments Dates Agencies
DOCUMENT ID: [Release No. 34-58050; File No. SR-NYSE-2008-53]
SUBJECT CATEGORY: Self-Regulatory Organizations; New York Stock Exchange LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change Amending NYSE Rule 123D (Openings and Halts in Trading) To Provide for a Limited Exemption for Securities Trading on the Exchange That Are Part of the Russell Index Reconstitution
DOCUMENT SUMMARY: June 27, 2008.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on June 27, 2008, the New York Stock Exchange LLC (``NYSE'' or
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I and
II below, which Items have been substantially prepared by the Exchange.
NYSE filed the proposed rule change as a ``noncontroversial'' proposal
pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \3\ and Rule 19b4(f)(6)
thereunder,\4\ which renders the proposal effective upon filing with
the Commission. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons. \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b4.
\3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
\4\ 17 CFR 240.19b4(f)(6).
I. SelfRegulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change
NYSE proposes to amend NYSE Rule 123D to exempt orders for any
security that is trading on the Exchange on June 27, 2008, and is part
of the Russell Index Reconstitution \5\ (a ``Russell Stock''), from the
provisions of the nonregulatory trading halt condition designated as
``Subpenny trading'' as set forth in subsection (3) of the rule. The
text of the proposed rule change is available at the Exchange, the
Commission's Public Reference Room, and http://www.nyse.com.
\5\ On June 27, 2008, the Russell Investment Group will
reconstitute certain of its indices, including the Russell 3000[supreg] Index and the Russell Microcap[supreg] Index.
II. SelfRegulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
Sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements.
A. SelfRegulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
Through this filing, the Exchange proposes to amend NYSE Rule 123D to provide a limited exemption for orders in a Russell Stock that is trading on the Exchange on June 27, 2008, and is part of the Russell Index Reconstitution, from the provisions of the nonregulatory trading halt condition designated as ``Subpenny trading'' pursuant to NYSE Rule 123D(3).
Pursuant to NYSE Rule 123D(3), whenever a security trading on the
Exchange is reported on the consolidated tape during normal trading
hours as having traded at a price of $1.05 or less, or if a security
would open on the Exchange at a price of $1.05 or less, trading in the
security on the Exchange shall be immediately halted due to a ``Sub
penny trading'' condition. Once halted for such reason, trading shall
not resume on the Exchange until the security has traded on another
automated trading center, as defined in Rule 600(b)(4) of Regulation
NMS (``Reg NMS''),\6\ for at least one entire trading day at a price or
prices that are at all times at or above $1.10. Any such resumption of
trading shall occur at the beginning of a trading day, so that normal
opening procedures can apply. In contrast to other trading halts
described in NYSE Rule 123D, a ``Subpenny trading'' halt is automatic
and does not require the approval of any Floor Officials. However, if a
determination is made by a Floor Official that a trade that triggered a
halt because of a ``Subpenny trading'' condition was made in error or
otherwise was an anomaly, trading of the security on the Exchange will
resume immediately. Orders entered with the Exchange in a security
subject to a ``Subpenny trading'' condition halt will be routed to
NYSE Arca, where they will be handled in accordance with the rules governing that market. The
[[Page 38271]]
Exchange will cancel any open limit orders in the Display Book system
with respect to securities that become subject to a ``Subpenny trading'' condition halt.
\6\ See 17 CFR 242.600(b)(4).
The Exchange seeks, through this filing, a limited exemption from the provisions of NYSE Rule 123D(3) on June 27, 2008. The Exchange believes that this exemption is necessary to address the possibility that a particular Russell Stock might open or trade on the Exchange at a price of $1.05 or less, thereby invoking the ``Subpenny trading'' condition halt. In that instance, trading in the Russell Stock would be halted on the Exchange for the rest of the trading day and unexecuted limit orders remaining on the Display Book would be cancelled. More importantly, there would be no closing transaction on the Exchange for the Russell Stock on the day a ``Subpenny trading'' condition halt was in effect and thus, no ability to price such stock during the Russell Index Reconstitution.
Pursuant to this proposed limited exemption, the Exchange would not invoke the ``Subpenny trading'' halt if the Russell Stock opened or traded on the Exchange at a price of $1.05 or less. Rather, the Exchange would permit the Russell Stock to continue to trade. If such stock were to trade at a price of $0.99 or less, a nonregulatory trading condition designated as ``Equipment Changeover'' would be implemented. When an ``Equipment Changeover'' condition trading halt is invoked, Exchange Systems will continue to accept all orders in the Russell Stock. Open orders in the Russell Stock on the NYSE Display Book system will not be cancelled nor will such orders be routed to NYSE Arca. Instead, all orders that have been entered will be aggregated for purposes of a closing transaction pursuant to all relevant NYSE rules governing the close. The Exchange believes that only one Russell Stock trading on the Exchange could potentially be eligible for a ``Subpenny trading'' condition halt on June 27, 2008. Accordingly, the Exchange states that this limited exemption is applicable to only one such Russell Stock. If such security does not trade at a price of $1.05 or less, this limited exemption would prove unnecessary and would expire at the close of trading on June 27, 2008.
The Exchange believes further that this limited exception would ensure that on June 27, 2008, each Russell Stock would be subject to pricing on the NYSE close, removing the possibility that such stock might be adversely affected on the close, causing potential harm to the market and to investors.
The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with Section 6(b) of the Act,\7\ in general, and furthers the
objectives of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,\8\ in particular, in that it
is designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices,
to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to remove
impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and
a national market system, and, in general, to protect investors and the
public interest. The Exchange believes the proposed rule change would
ensure that trading in Russell Stocks and the Russell Index
Reconstitution on June 27, 2008, would proceed without any impediment. \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\8\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
B. SelfRegulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
C. SelfRegulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
The Exchange states that written comments on the proposed rule change were neither solicited nor received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action
Because the foregoing proposed rule change: (1) Does not
significantly affect the protection of investors or the public
interest; (2) does not impose any significant burden on competition;
and (3) by its terms does not become operative for 30 days after the
date of this filing, or such shorter time as the Commission may
designate if consistent with the protection of investors and the public
interest, the proposed rule change has become effective pursuant to
Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \9\ and Rule 19b4(f)(6) thereunder.\10\ \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
\10\ 17 CFR 240.19b4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b4(f)(6)(iii)
requires a selfregulatory organization to provide the Commission
with written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change,
along with a brief description and text of the proposed rule change,
at least five business days prior to the date of filing of the
proposed rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the
Commission. The Commission is waiving the five businessday requirement.
A proposed rule change filed under Rule 19b4(f)(6) normally does not become operative for 30 days after the date of filing. However, Rule 19b4(f)(6)(iii) permits the Commission to designate a shorter time if such action is consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest. The Exchange requests that the Commission waive the five businessday prefiling requirement and the 30day operative delay so that it may immediately implement the limited exemption to the provisions of NYSE Rule 123D to ensure that Russell Stocks would be subject to pricing on the NYSE close on June 27, 2008. The Exchange states that the proposed rule change does not significantly affect the protection of investors or the public interest and does not impose any significant burden on competition.
The Commission believes that waiving the 30day operative delay and five businessday prefiling requirement is consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest.\11\ The Commission believes that this narrowly tailored exception to NYSE Rule 123D(3), lasting only for the duration of one trading day, should help to ensure fair and orderly markets on June 27, 2008, the day of the Russell Index Reconstitution. The Commission notes that the requirements of Rule 611 of Reg NMS \12\ would still apply. For these reasons, the Commission designates the proposed rule change as operative upon filing. \11\ For purposes only of waiving the 30day operative delay and five businessday prefiling requirement, the Commission has also considered the proposed rule's impact on efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule change, the Commission may summarily abrogate such rule change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods:
Electronic Comments
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.\13\
\13\ 17 CFR 200.303(a)(12).
Florence E. Harmon,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. E815070 Filed 7208; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 801001P
SUMMARY: New York Stock Exchange LLC,
DOCUMENT BODY 2: June 27, 2008.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on June 27, 2008, the New York Stock Exchange LLC (``NYSE'' or
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I and
II below, which Items have been substantially prepared by the Exchange.
NYSE filed the proposed rule change as a ``noncontroversial'' proposal
pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \3\ and Rule 19b4(f)(6)
thereunder,\4\ which renders the proposal effective upon filing with
the Commission. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons. \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b4.
\3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
\4\ 17 CFR 240.19b4(f)(6).
I. SelfRegulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change
NYSE proposes to amend NYSE Rule 123D to exempt orders for any
security that is trading on the Exchange on June 27, 2008, and is part
of the Russell Index Reconstitution \5\ (a ``Russell Stock''), from the
provisions of the nonregulatory trading halt condition designated as
``Subpenny trading'' as set forth in subsection (3) of the rule. The
text of the proposed rule change is available at the Exchange, the
Commission's Public Reference Room, and http://www.nyse.com.
\5\ On June 27, 2008, the Russell Investment Group will
reconstitute certain of its indices, including the Russell 3000[supreg] Index and the Russell Microcap[supreg] Index.
II. SelfRegulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
Sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements.
A. SelfRegulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
Through this filing, the Exchange proposes to amend NYSE Rule 123D to provide a limited exemption for orders in a Russell Stock that is trading on the Exchange on June 27, 2008, and is part of the Russell Index Reconstitution, from the provisions of the nonregulatory trading halt condition designated as ``Subpenny trading'' pursuant to NYSE Rule 123D(3).
Pursuant to NYSE Rule 123D(3), whenever a security trading on the
Exchange is reported on the consolidated tape during normal trading
hours as having traded at a price of $1.05 or less, or if a security
would open on the Exchange at a price of $1.05 or less, trading in the
security on the Exchange shall be immediately halted due to a ``Sub
penny trading'' condition. Once halted for such reason, trading shall
not resume on the Exchange until the security has traded on another
automated trading center, as defined in Rule 600(b)(4) of Regulation
NMS (``Reg NMS''),\6\ for at least one entire trading day at a price or
prices that are at all times at or above $1.10. Any such resumption of
trading shall occur at the beginning of a trading day, so that normal
opening procedures can apply. In contrast to other trading halts
described in NYSE Rule 123D, a ``Subpenny trading'' halt is automatic
and does not require the approval of any Floor Officials. However, if a
determination is made by a Floor Official that a trade that triggered a
halt because of a ``Subpenny trading'' condition was made in error or
otherwise was an anomaly, trading of the security on the Exchange will
resume immediately. Orders entered with the Exchange in a security
subject to a ``Subpenny trading'' condition halt will be routed to
NYSE Arca, where they will be handled in accordance with the rules governing that market. The
[[Page 38271]]
Exchange will cancel any open limit orders in the Display Book system
with respect to securities that become subject to a ``Subpenny trading'' condition halt.
\6\ See 17 CFR 242.600(b)(4).
The Exchange seeks, through this filing, a limited exemption from the provisions of NYSE Rule 123D(3) on June 27, 2008. The Exchange believes that this exemption is necessary to address the possibility that a particular Russell Stock might open or trade on the Exchange at a price of $1.05 or less, thereby invoking the ``Subpenny trading'' condition halt. In that instance, trading in the Russell Stock would be halted on the Exchange for the rest of the trading day and unexecuted limit orders remaining on the Display Book would be cancelled. More importantly, there would be no closing transaction on the Exchange for the Russell Stock on the day a ``Subpenny trading'' condition halt was in effect and thus, no ability to price such stock during the Russell Index Reconstitution.
Pursuant to this proposed limited exemption, the Exchange would not invoke the ``Subpenny trading'' halt if the Russell Stock opened or traded on the Exchange at a price of $1.05 or less. Rather, the Exchange would permit the Russell Stock to continue to trade. If such stock were to trade at a price of $0.99 or less, a nonregulatory trading condition designated as ``Equipment Changeover'' would be implemented. When an ``Equipment Changeover'' condition trading halt is invoked, Exchange Systems will continue to accept all orders in the Russell Stock. Open orders in the Russell Stock on the NYSE Display Book system will not be cancelled nor will such orders be routed to NYSE Arca. Instead, all orders that have been entered will be aggregated for purposes of a closing transaction pursuant to all relevant NYSE rules governing the close. The Exchange believes that only one Russell Stock trading on the Exchange could potentially be eligible for a ``Subpenny trading'' condition halt on June 27, 2008. Accordingly, the Exchange states that this limited exemption is applicable to only one such Russell Stock. If such security does not trade at a price of $1.05 or less, this limited exemption would prove unnecessary and would expire at the close of trading on June 27, 2008.
The Exchange believes further that this limited exception would ensure that on June 27, 2008, each Russell Stock would be subject to pricing on the NYSE close, removing the possibility that such stock might be adversely affected on the close, causing potential harm to the market and to investors.
The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with Section 6(b) of the Act,\7\ in general, and furthers the
objectives of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,\8\ in particular, in that it
is designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices,
to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to remove
impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and
a national market system, and, in general, to protect investors and the
public interest. The Exchange believes the proposed rule change would
ensure that trading in Russell Stocks and the Russell Index
Reconstitution on June 27, 2008, would proceed without any impediment. \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\8\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
B. SelfRegulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
C. SelfRegulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
The Exchange states that written comments on the proposed rule change were neither solicited nor received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action
Because the foregoing proposed rule change: (1) Does not
significantly affect the protection of investors or the public
interest; (2) does not impose any significant burden on competition;
and (3) by its terms does not become operative for 30 days after the
date of this filing, or such shorter time as the Commission may
designate if consistent with the protection of investors and the public
interest, the proposed rule change has become effective pursuant to
Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \9\ and Rule 19b4(f)(6) thereunder.\10\ \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
\10\ 17 CFR 240.19b4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b4(f)(6)(iii)
requires a selfregulatory organization to provide the Commission
with written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change,
along with a brief description and text of the proposed rule change,
at least five business days prior to the date of filing of the
proposed rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the
Commission. The Commission is waiving the five businessday requirement.
A proposed rule change filed under Rule 19b4(f)(6) normally does not become operative for 30 days after the date of filing. However, Rule 19b4(f)(6)(iii) permits the Commission to designate a shorter time if such action is consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest. The Exchange requests that the Commission waive the five businessday prefiling requirement and the 30day operative delay so that it may immediately implement the limited exemption to the provisions of NYSE Rule 123D to ensure that Russell Stocks would be subject to pricing on the NYSE close on June 27, 2008. The Exchange states that the proposed rule change does not significantly affect the protection of investors or the public interest and does not impose any significant burden on competition.
The Commission believes that waiving the 30day operative delay and five businessday prefiling requirement is consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest.\11\ The Commission believes that this narrowly tailored exception to NYSE Rule 123D(3), lasting only for the duration of one trading day, should help to ensure fair and orderly markets on June 27, 2008, the day of the Russell Index Reconstitution. The Commission notes that the requirements of Rule 611 of Reg NMS \12\ would still apply. For these reasons, the Commission designates the proposed rule change as operative upon filing. \11\ For purposes only of waiving the 30day operative delay and five businessday prefiling requirement, the Commission has also considered the proposed rule's impact on efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule change, the Commission may summarily abrogate such rule change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods:
Electronic Comments
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.\13\
\13\ 17 CFR 200.303(a)(12).
Florence E. Harmon,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. E815070 Filed 7208; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 801001P
14 CFR Part 39 40 CFR Part 52 14 CFR Part 71 33 CFR Part 165 50 CFR Part 679 47 CFR Part 73 26 CFR Part 1 40 CFR Part 180 33 CFR Part 117 50 CFR Part 17 44 CFR Part 67 50 CFR Part 648 14 CFR Part 97 33 CFR Part 100 40 CFR Part 63 50 CFR Part 622 44 CFR Part 65 50 CFR Part 660 26 CFR Part 301 39 CFR Part 111 40 CFR Part 300 6 CFR Part 5 40 CFR Part 271 47 CFR Part 64 40 CFR Parts 52 and 81 50 CFR Part 665 44 CFR Part 64 10 CFR Part 50 49 CFR Part 571 47 CFR Part 76