Browse: Departments Dates Agencies
DOCUMENT ID: [Release No. 34-58128; File No. SR-FICC-2007-04]
SUBJECT CATEGORY: Self-Regulatory Organizations; Fixed Income Clearing Corporation; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change Relating to Applicant and Member Disqualification Criteria
DOCUMENT SUMMARY: July 9, 2008.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ notice is hereby given that on April 30, 2007, the Fixed
Income Clearing Corporation (``FICC'') filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (``Commission'') a proposed rule change and on
February 7, 2008, and March 19, 2008, amended the proposed rule change
as described in Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been
prepared substantially by FICC. The Commission is publishing this
notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
\1\ U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
I. SelfRegulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change
The proposed rule change would amend FICC's Government Securities
Division's (``GSD'') and Mortgage Backed Securities Division's
(``MBSD'') (collectively, ``Divisions'') rules concerning applicant and member disqualification criteria.
II. SelfRegulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, FICC included statements concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. FICC has prepared summaries, set forth in Sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements. A. SelfRegulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
The purpose of this filing is for FICC to amend GSD's and MBSD's
rules concerning applicant and member disqualification criteria in
order to make the Divisions' rules consistent with the rules of FICC's
affiliated clearing agencies, the National Securities Clearing
Corporation (``NSCC'') and The Depository Trust Company (``DTC''). The proposed rule changes cover the following areas:
1. Management Consideration of Disqualification Criteria \2\ \2\ GSD Rule 2A, Section 3(d).
GSD's membership qualification rules currently require FICC's Board
of Directors to determine whether the presence of certain negative
factors affecting a membership application should constitute the basis
for denying membership to such applicant. Information that might disqualify an applicant (referred to in GSD's rules as
``disqualification criteria'') include the applicant being subject to a
statutory disqualification \3\ or conviction of various crimes such as
bribery. The disqualification criteria in GSD's rules similarly apply as standards for continued membership.
\3\ See 15 U.S.C. 78c(a)(39) (definition of ``statutory disqualification'').
FICC proposes to change GSD's disqualification criteria to allow FICC's management, instead of FICC's Board, to determine whether the presence of a potential disqualifier should prevent an entity from obtaining or continuing membership in GSD. Such change would conform to the rules of MBSD, DTC, and NSCC, which allow such determinations to be made by management.
GSD's and MBSD's respective rules also apply certain applicant and [[Page 40894]]
member disqualification criteria to persons ``associated'' (in GSD's
rules) or ``affiliated'' (in MBSD's rules) with the applicant or member
firm. FICC states that it is not always practical for it to ascertain
which individuals are ``associated'' or ``affiliated'' with a
particular entity and therefore proposes to amend these rules to
conform them to its internal surveillance procedures and make them
consistent across both Divisions. Accordingly, references to persons
``associated'' or ``affiliated'' with the member or applicant would be
changed to references to ``controlling management,'' which will include
those officers of the applicant or member that are currently screened by FICC's Risk Management department pursuant to internal
procedures.\4\ In addition, FICC proposes to add language to its rules
that would require applicants to inform FICC as to any member of its
controlling management that is or becomes subject to statutory disqualification.
\4\ Proposed GSD Rule 1 and MBSD Article I (``The term
`controlling management' shall mean the Chief Executive Officer, the
Chief Financial Officer, and the Chief Operations Officer, or their equivalents, of an applicant of Participant.'').
Under the proposal, GSD's disqualification criteria would be amended to reflect an approach that such criteria should be objectively and practically monitored. Specifically, FICC proposes to delete one disqualification criterion that refers to an applicant being subject to ``closer than normal'' surveillance by a regulatory body. FICC states that this event might not be reported in a regulatory background check.
In addition, MBSD's rules currently contain only two criteria that may be the basis for denial of a membership application, including: (i) An applicant's subjection to a statutory disqualification or similar order by another examining authority and (ii) an applicant or an associated person of the applicant making a misstatement of a material fact in connection with its membership application or thereafter. MBSD proposes to add GSD's remaining disqualification criteria, which would result in the Divisions' having identical disqualification criteria.
Finally, FICC proposes adding a provision to both Divisions' rules that would clarify FICC's right to deny membership to an applicant or member if FICC learns of any factor or circumstance that might impact the suitability of that particular applicant or member as a participant.
FICC proposes to make the following changes to provide additional uniformity among the Divisions' rules, NSCC, and DTC:
Conforming changes would be made to the cease to act provisions of GSD's rules (Rule 21, ``Restrictions on Access to Services'') in order to ensure consistency within the rules and across the Divisions.
FICC states that the proposed rule change is consistent with the
requirements of Section 17A of the Act \6\ and the rules and
regulations thereunder because they provide consistency and
transparency with respect to the applicant and member disqualification
criteria in the GSD and MBSD rules, thereby promoting the prompt and
accurate clearance and settlement of securities transactions. \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78q1.
B. SelfRegulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
FICC believes that the proposed rule change does not impact or impose any burden on competition.
C. SelfRegulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
FICC has not solicited or received written comments relating to the
proposed rule change. FICC will notify the Commission of any written comments it receives.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action
Within thirtyfive days of the date of publication of this notice
in the Federal Register or within such longer period (i) as the
Commission may designate up to ninety days of such date if it finds
such longer period to be appropriate and publishes its reasons for so
finding or (ii) as to which the selfregulatory organization consents, the Commission will:
(A) By order approve such proposed rule change or
(B) Institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule change should be disapproved.
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods:
Electronic Comments
For the Commission by the Division of Trading and Markets pursuant to delegated authority.\7\
\7\ 17 CFR 200.303(a)(12).
Florence E. Harmon,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. E816230 Filed 71508; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 801001P
SUMMARY: Fixed Income Clearing Corp.,
DOCUMENT BODY 2: July 9, 2008.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ notice is hereby given that on April 30, 2007, the Fixed
Income Clearing Corporation (``FICC'') filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (``Commission'') a proposed rule change and on
February 7, 2008, and March 19, 2008, amended the proposed rule change
as described in Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been
prepared substantially by FICC. The Commission is publishing this
notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
\1\ U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
I. SelfRegulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change
The proposed rule change would amend FICC's Government Securities
Division's (``GSD'') and Mortgage Backed Securities Division's
(``MBSD'') (collectively, ``Divisions'') rules concerning applicant and member disqualification criteria.
II. SelfRegulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, FICC included statements concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. FICC has prepared summaries, set forth in Sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements. A. SelfRegulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
The purpose of this filing is for FICC to amend GSD's and MBSD's
rules concerning applicant and member disqualification criteria in
order to make the Divisions' rules consistent with the rules of FICC's
affiliated clearing agencies, the National Securities Clearing
Corporation (``NSCC'') and The Depository Trust Company (``DTC''). The proposed rule changes cover the following areas:
1. Management Consideration of Disqualification Criteria \2\ \2\ GSD Rule 2A, Section 3(d).
GSD's membership qualification rules currently require FICC's Board
of Directors to determine whether the presence of certain negative
factors affecting a membership application should constitute the basis
for denying membership to such applicant. Information that might disqualify an applicant (referred to in GSD's rules as
``disqualification criteria'') include the applicant being subject to a
statutory disqualification \3\ or conviction of various crimes such as
bribery. The disqualification criteria in GSD's rules similarly apply as standards for continued membership.
\3\ See 15 U.S.C. 78c(a)(39) (definition of ``statutory disqualification'').
FICC proposes to change GSD's disqualification criteria to allow FICC's management, instead of FICC's Board, to determine whether the presence of a potential disqualifier should prevent an entity from obtaining or continuing membership in GSD. Such change would conform to the rules of MBSD, DTC, and NSCC, which allow such determinations to be made by management.
GSD's and MBSD's respective rules also apply certain applicant and [[Page 40894]]
member disqualification criteria to persons ``associated'' (in GSD's
rules) or ``affiliated'' (in MBSD's rules) with the applicant or member
firm. FICC states that it is not always practical for it to ascertain
which individuals are ``associated'' or ``affiliated'' with a
particular entity and therefore proposes to amend these rules to
conform them to its internal surveillance procedures and make them
consistent across both Divisions. Accordingly, references to persons
``associated'' or ``affiliated'' with the member or applicant would be
changed to references to ``controlling management,'' which will include
those officers of the applicant or member that are currently screened by FICC's Risk Management department pursuant to internal
procedures.\4\ In addition, FICC proposes to add language to its rules
that would require applicants to inform FICC as to any member of its
controlling management that is or becomes subject to statutory disqualification.
\4\ Proposed GSD Rule 1 and MBSD Article I (``The term
`controlling management' shall mean the Chief Executive Officer, the
Chief Financial Officer, and the Chief Operations Officer, or their equivalents, of an applicant of Participant.'').
Under the proposal, GSD's disqualification criteria would be amended to reflect an approach that such criteria should be objectively and practically monitored. Specifically, FICC proposes to delete one disqualification criterion that refers to an applicant being subject to ``closer than normal'' surveillance by a regulatory body. FICC states that this event might not be reported in a regulatory background check.
In addition, MBSD's rules currently contain only two criteria that may be the basis for denial of a membership application, including: (i) An applicant's subjection to a statutory disqualification or similar order by another examining authority and (ii) an applicant or an associated person of the applicant making a misstatement of a material fact in connection with its membership application or thereafter. MBSD proposes to add GSD's remaining disqualification criteria, which would result in the Divisions' having identical disqualification criteria.
Finally, FICC proposes adding a provision to both Divisions' rules that would clarify FICC's right to deny membership to an applicant or member if FICC learns of any factor or circumstance that might impact the suitability of that particular applicant or member as a participant.
FICC proposes to make the following changes to provide additional uniformity among the Divisions' rules, NSCC, and DTC:
Conforming changes would be made to the cease to act provisions of GSD's rules (Rule 21, ``Restrictions on Access to Services'') in order to ensure consistency within the rules and across the Divisions.
FICC states that the proposed rule change is consistent with the
requirements of Section 17A of the Act \6\ and the rules and
regulations thereunder because they provide consistency and
transparency with respect to the applicant and member disqualification
criteria in the GSD and MBSD rules, thereby promoting the prompt and
accurate clearance and settlement of securities transactions. \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78q1.
B. SelfRegulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
FICC believes that the proposed rule change does not impact or impose any burden on competition.
C. SelfRegulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
FICC has not solicited or received written comments relating to the
proposed rule change. FICC will notify the Commission of any written comments it receives.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action
Within thirtyfive days of the date of publication of this notice
in the Federal Register or within such longer period (i) as the
Commission may designate up to ninety days of such date if it finds
such longer period to be appropriate and publishes its reasons for so
finding or (ii) as to which the selfregulatory organization consents, the Commission will:
(A) By order approve such proposed rule change or
(B) Institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule change should be disapproved.
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods:
Electronic Comments
For the Commission by the Division of Trading and Markets pursuant to delegated authority.\7\
\7\ 17 CFR 200.303(a)(12).
Florence E. Harmon,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. E816230 Filed 71508; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 801001P
14 CFR Part 39 40 CFR Part 52 14 CFR Part 71 33 CFR Part 165 50 CFR Part 679 47 CFR Part 73 26 CFR Part 1 40 CFR Part 180 33 CFR Part 117 50 CFR Part 17 44 CFR Part 67 50 CFR Part 648 14 CFR Part 97 33 CFR Part 100 40 CFR Part 63 50 CFR Part 622 44 CFR Part 65 50 CFR Part 660 26 CFR Part 301 39 CFR Part 111 40 CFR Part 300 6 CFR Part 5 40 CFR Part 271 47 CFR Part 64 40 CFR Parts 52 and 81 50 CFR Part 665 44 CFR Part 64 10 CFR Part 50 49 CFR Part 571 47 CFR Part 76