Browse: Departments Dates Agencies
SUBJECT CATEGORY: Motorized Vehicle Use on the Rogue River-Siskiyou National Forest
DOCUMENT SUMMARY: The Rogue River-Siskiyou National Forest (Forest) will prepare
an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) to document and disclose the
potential environmental effects of establishing and designating a
system of roads, trails and areas for wheeled motorized vehicles. The
Proposed Action would designate the location, type of vehicle and season of use for motorized vehicles
[[Page 50300]]
across the entire Forest in order to meet the intent of the Travel
Management; Designated Routes and Areas for Motor Vehicle Use, Final
Rule that was published on November 9, 2005 (70 FR 216). Overthesnow
vehicles are excluded from this Proposed Action. A Forest Plan
Amendment would be required to achieve the purpose and need, and
implement the Proposed Action.
SUMMARY: Motorized Vehicle Use on the Rogue River-Siskiyou National Forest,
On November 9, 2005, the Forest Service published final travel management regulations in the Federal Register (FR Vol. 70, No. 216 Nov. 9, 2005, pp. 6826468291). This final Travel Management Rule requires designation of those roads, trails, and areas that are open to motor vehicle use by the public on National Forests. Designations will be made by class of vehicle and, if appropriate, by time of year. The final rule prohibits the use of motor vehicles by the public off the designated system as well as use of motor vehicles on routes and in areas that are not designated. Persons exempt from the final rule prohibitions would be those with a permit specifically authorizing access. Examples include access to private property, a mining claim or a communication site.
In June 2007, the Forest hosted a series of four open houses in southwest Oregon to provide people an opportunity to learn more about the Travel Analysis process that identifies and designates roads, trails, and areas open to motor vehicles. In addition, Forest representatives met with a number of individuals, groups and neighboring land management agencies in order for motorized and non motorized users alike to get involved early as we began to gather information for the project.
Since that time Forest planners and resource specialists have verified and completed an inventory of existing open roads and trails. Currently, there are approximately 4,620 road miles and approximately 1,155 trail miles. Motorized trails account for approximately 15% (170 miles) of the total trail miles.
Under the Proposed Action, roads, trails and areas that are currently part of the Forest transportation system and are open to wheeled motorized vehicle travel would remain designated for such use except as described below. This proposal focuses on the designation of wheeled motorized vehicle routes and areas. The Proposed Action is being carried forward in accordance with the Travel Management Rule (36 CFR Part 212).
In accordance with the rule and following a decision on this proposal, the Forest will publish a Motor Vehicle Use Map (MVUM) identifying all Forest roads, trails and areas that are designated open for motor vehicle use by the public. The MVUM shall specify the classes of vehicles and, if appropriate, the times of year for which use is authorized. The MVUM will be updated and published annually (or more frequently if needed) when changes to the Forest's transportation system are made. Future decisions associated with changes to the MVUM may trigger the need for documentation of additional environmental analysis.
The purpose for action is to enact the Travel Management Rule. Motorized use is a popular use and is an important form of recreation for many individuals, families, and groups. A designated and managed system is needed to provide this use. Increased demand for motorized use, lack of designated areas/routes, and the inconsistent direction contained in the Forest Plans, has led to resource damage and social impacts, user conflicts, and safety concerns.
Based on the stated purpose and need for action and as a result of the recent Travel Analysis process, the Forest proposes to:
Maps illustrating the Proposed Action can found at: http://
www.fs.fed.us/r6/rogue siskiyou/projects/travel/.
In addition, maps will be available for viewing at:
Forest Supervisor's Office, 3040 Biddle Road, Medford, OR 97504
Gold Beach Ranger District, 29279 Ellensburg Ave., Gold Beach, OR 97444 or 539 Chetco Aye, Brookings, OR 97415
High Cascades Ranger District, 47201 Highway 62, Prospect, OR 97536 or 730 Laurel St., Butte Falls, OR 97522
Powers Ranger District, 42861 Highway 242, Powers, OR 97466
Siskiyou Mountains Ranger District, 6941 Upper Applegate Road,
Jacksonville, OR 97530 or 645 Washington Street, Ashland, OR 97520
Wild Rivers Ranger District, 2164 N.E. Spalding Avenue, Grants Pass, OR 97526 or 26568 Redwood Hwy., Cave Junction, OR 97523
The Forest Supervisor, Scott D. Conroy, is the Responsible Official for making the decision and providing direction for the analysis under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA).
Public participation will be especially important at several points during the analysis. The Forest Service will be seeking information, comments, and assistance from the federal, state, and local agencies and other individuals or organizations who may be interested in or affected by the Proposed Action.
The Draft Environmental Impact Statement is expected to be filed
with the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and to be available for
public review by December 2008. EPA will publish a notice of
availability (NOA) of the Draft EIS in the Federal Register. [[Page 50301]]
The comment period on the Draft EIS will extend 45 days from the date
the EPA publishes the NOA in the Federal Register. At that time, copies
of the Draft EIS will be distributed to interested and affected
agencies, organizations, and members of the public for their review and
comment. It is very important that those interested in the management
of the Rogue RiverSiskiyou National Forest participate at that time.
Submission of comments in response to the Draft EIS is a prerequisite
for eligibility to appeal under the 36 CFR part 217 regulations.
The Final EIS is scheduled to be completed in February 2009. In the Final EIS, the Forest Service will respond to comments received during the comment period that pertain to the environmental consequences discussed in the Draft EIS and applicable laws, regulations, and policies considered in making the decision.
This Notice of Intent initiates the scoping process which guides the development of the Environmental Impact Statement. Comments received, including the names and addresses of those who comment, will be considered part of the public record on this proposal and will be available for public inspection.
The Forest Service believes, at this early stage, it is important to give reviewers notice of several court rulings related to public participation in the environmental review process. First, reviewers of Draft Environmental Impact Statements must structure their participation in the environmental review of the proposal so that it is meaningful and alerts an agency to the reviewer's position and contentions (Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. NRDC, 435 U.S. 519, 553 (1978)). Also, environmental objections that could be raised at the Draft Environmental Impact Statement stage, but that are not raised until after completion of the Final Environmental Impact Statement may be waived or dismissed by the courts. City of Angoon v. Hodel, 803 F.2d 1016, 1022 (9th Cir. 1986) and Wisconsin Heritages, Inc. v. Harris, 490 F. Supp. 1334, 1338 (E.D. Wis. 1980). Because of these court rulings, it is very important that those interested in this Proposed Action participate by the close of the 45 day comment period so that substantive comments and objections are made available to the Forest Service at a time when it can meaningfully consider them and respond to them in the Final Environmental Impact Statement.
To assist the Forest Service in identifying and considering issues
and concerns on the Proposed Action, comments on the Draft
Environmental Impact Statement should be as specific as possible. It is
also helpful if comments refer to specific pages or chapters of the
Draft Environmental Impact Statement. Comments may also address the
adequacy of the Draft Environmental Impact Statement or the merits of
the alternatives formulated and discussed in the statement. Reviewers
may wish to refer to the Council on Environmental Quality Regulations
for implementing the procedural provisions of the National
Environmental Policy Act at 40 CFR 1503.3 in addressing these points.
(Authority: 40 CFR 1501.7 and 1508.22; Forest Service Handbook 1909.15, Section 21)
Dated: August 18, 2008.
Scott D. Conroy,
Forest Supervisor, Rogue RiverSiskiyou National Forest.
[FR Doc. E819675 Filed 82508; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 341011M
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT Steve Johnson, Team Leader, Siskiyou Mountains Ranger District, 645 Washington St., Ashland, OR 97520. Phone: (541) 5522900.
14 CFR Part 39 40 CFR Part 52 14 CFR Part 71 33 CFR Part 165 50 CFR Part 679 47 CFR Part 73 26 CFR Part 1 40 CFR Part 180 33 CFR Part 117 50 CFR Part 17 44 CFR Part 67 50 CFR Part 648 14 CFR Part 97 33 CFR Part 100 40 CFR Part 63 50 CFR Part 622 44 CFR Part 65 50 CFR Part 660 26 CFR Part 301 39 CFR Part 111 40 CFR Part 300 6 CFR Part 5 40 CFR Part 271 47 CFR Part 64 40 CFR Parts 52 and 81 50 CFR Part 665 44 CFR Part 64 10 CFR Part 50 49 CFR Part 571 47 CFR Part 76