<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>

<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>The Federal Register</title>
    <link>http://thefederalregister.com/b.p/agency/Drug_Enforcement_Administration/2008-07-14/</link>
    <description>Daily Publications of Meetings and Rules Changes for the Federal Government</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, Dec 1 2008 11:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, Dec 1 2008 11:00:00 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <webMaster>info@thefederalregister.com</webMaster>
    <item>
  <title><![CDATA[  Electronic Prescriptions for Controlled Substances ]]></title>
  <link>http://thefederalregister.com/d.p/2008-07-14-Z8-14405</link>
  <description><![CDATA[ Correction</p><p>    In proposed rule document E814405 beginning on page 36722 in the 
issue of Friday, June 27, 2008, make the following correction:
</p><p>    On page 36766, in Table 18, in the third column, in the first  entry, ``$167,70'' should read ``$167,270''.<br/> [FR Doc. Z814405 Filed 71108; 8:45 am]<br/>
BILLING CODE 150501D
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
google_ad_client = "pub-2051746026283201";
google_ad_width = 728;
google_ad_height = 15;
google_ad_format = "728x15_0ads_al";
//2007-08-22: federalregister-rss
google_ad_channel = "2005962856";
google_color_border = "CC0000";
google_color_bg = "FFFFFF";
google_color_link = "CC0000";
google_color_text = "000000";
google_color_url = "008000";
//-->
</script>
<script type="text/javascript"
  src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">
</script>
]]></description>
  <guid>http://thefederalregister.com/d.p/2008-07-14-Z8-14405</guid>
  <pubDate>Mon, Jul 14 2008 11:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
  <title><![CDATA[  Randall Relyea, D.O.; Denial of Application ]]></title>
  <link>http://thefederalregister.com/d.p/2008-07-14-E8-15923</link>
  <description><![CDATA[
</p><p>    On July 25, 2007, the Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of 
Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration, issued an Order to 
Show Cause to Randall Relyea, D.O. (Respondent), of Price, Utah. The 
Show Cause Order proposed the revocation of Respondent's DEA 
Certificate of Registration, BR8899809, as a practitioner, on the 
ground that Respondent's ``continued registration is inconsistent with  the public interest.'' Show Cause Order at 1.</p><p>    The Show Cause Order specifically alleged that in February 2007, 
Respondent had engaged in a scheme to have one of his patients obtain 
narcotic controlled substances for his personal use. Show Cause Order 
at 1. The Show Cause Order also alleged that during the previous year, 
Respondent had engaged in ``a similar scheme * * * to acquire 
narcotics,'' and that Respondent had been charged with multiple felony 
narcotics offenses under Utah law with respect to both schemes. Id.
</p><p>    The Show Cause Order further alleged that in 1999, Respondent had 
been ``<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
google_ad_client = "pub-2051746026283201";
google_ad_width = 728;
google_ad_height = 15;
google_ad_format = "728x15_0ads_al";
//2007-08-22: federalregister-rss
google_ad_channel = "2005962856";
google_color_border = "CC0000";
google_color_bg = "FFFFFF";
google_color_link = "CC0000";
google_color_text = "000000";
google_color_url = "008000";
//-->
</script>
<script type="text/javascript"
  src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">
</script>
]]></description>
  <guid>http://thefederalregister.com/d.p/2008-07-14-E8-15923</guid>
  <pubDate>Mon, Jul 14 2008 11:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
  <title><![CDATA[  Armando B. Figueroa, M.D.; Revocation of Registration ]]></title>
  <link>http://thefederalregister.com/d.p/2008-07-14-E8-15922</link>
  <description><![CDATA[
</p><p>    On November 14, 2007, I, the Deputy Administrator of the Drug 
Enforcement Administration, issued an Order to Show Cause and Immediate 
Suspension of Registration to Armando B. Figueroa, M.D. (Respondent), 
of Washington, DC. The Order immediately suspended and proposed the 
revocation of Respondent's DEA Certificate of Registration, BF0128810, 
as a practitioner, on the grounds that his continued registration was 
``inconsistent with the public interest'' and ``constitute[d] an 
imminent danger to public health and safety.'' Show Cause Order at 1  (citing 21 U.S.C. 823(f) & 824(a)(4)).</p><p>    The Show Cause Order alleged that Respondent had ``repeatedly 
issued controlled substance prescriptions to [two individuals, S.S. and 
G.R.] for other than a legitimate medical purpose or while acting 
outside the usual course of professional practice in violation of 21 
CFR 1306.04(a).'' Show Cause Order at 1. More specifically, the Show 
Cause Order alleged that on October 17, 2007, law enforcement 
authorities had<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
google_ad_client = "pub-2051746026283201";
google_ad_width = 728;
google_ad_height = 15;
google_ad_format = "728x15_0ads_al";
//2007-08-22: federalregister-rss
google_ad_channel = "2005962856";
google_color_border = "CC0000";
google_color_bg = "FFFFFF";
google_color_link = "CC0000";
google_color_text = "000000";
google_color_url = "008000";
//-->
</script>
<script type="text/javascript"
  src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">
</script>
]]></description>
  <guid>http://thefederalregister.com/d.p/2008-07-14-E8-15922</guid>
  <pubDate>Mon, Jul 14 2008 11:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
  <title><![CDATA[  Michael Chait, M.D.; Revocation of Registration ]]></title>
  <link>http://thefederalregister.com/d.p/2008-07-14-E8-15938</link>
  <description><![CDATA[
</p><p>    On October 1, 2007, the Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of 
Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration, issued an Order to 
Show Cause to Michael Chait, M.D. (Respondent), of Amagansett, New 
York. The Show Cause Order proposed the revocation of Respondent's DEA 
Certificate of Registration, BC2825151, as a practitioner, and the 
denial of any pending applications to renew or modify his registration, 
on the ground that Respondent is ``not authorized to handle controlled  substances in New York.'' Show Cause Order at 1.</p><p>    More specifically, the Show Cause Order alleged that effective on 
May 25, 2007, the New York State Department of Health, State Board for 
Professional Medical Conduct, had, pursuant to an interim non
disciplinary order of conditions, prohibited Respondent from the 
practice of medicine in the State of New York. Id. The Show Cause Order 
thus alleged that Respondent is ``no longer authorized to handle 
controlled substances in New York, the state in which'' he maintains<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
google_ad_client = "pub-2051746026283201";
google_ad_width = 728;
google_ad_height = 15;
google_ad_format = "728x15_0ads_al";
//2007-08-22: federalregister-rss
google_ad_channel = "2005962856";
google_color_border = "CC0000";
google_color_bg = "FFFFFF";
google_color_link = "CC0000";
google_color_text = "000000";
google_color_url = "008000";
//-->
</script>
<script type="text/javascript"
  src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">
</script>
]]></description>
  <guid>http://thefederalregister.com/d.p/2008-07-14-E8-15938</guid>
  <pubDate>Mon, Jul 14 2008 11:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>

