<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>

<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>The Federal Register</title>
    <link>http://thefederalregister.com/b.p/department/DEPARTMENT_OF_TRANSPORTATION/2008-06-17/</link>
    <description>Daily Publications of Meetings and Rules Changes for the Federal Government</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, Jan 7 2009 11:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, Jan 7 2009 11:00:00 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <webMaster>info@thefederalregister.com</webMaster>
    <item>
  <title><![CDATA[  Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A300, A310, and A300-600  Series Airplanes]]></title>
  <link>http://thefederalregister.com/d.p/2008-06-17-E8-13566</link>
  <description><![CDATA[ The FAA proposes to supersede an existing airworthiness 
directive (AD) that applies to certain Airbus Model A300, A310, and 
A300600 series airplanes. The existing AD currently requires 
repetitive detailed visual inspections to detect cracks in the pylon 
thrust and sideload fitting of the wing, and replacement of any cracked 
pylon thrust and sideload fitting with a new fitting. This proposed AD  would<br/> [[Page 34225]]<br/>
reduce the threshold and repetitive intervals for the detailed 
inspection for certain airplanes and would reduce the applicability of 
the existing AD. This proposed AD results from issuance of mandatory 
continuing airworthiness information by a foreign civil airworthiness 
authority. We are proposing this AD to detect and correct cracks in the 
pylon thrust and sideload fitting of the wing, which could result in 
reduced structural integrity of the airplane.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
google_ad_client = "pub-2051746026283201";
google_ad_width = 728;
google_ad_height = 15;
google_ad_format = "728x15_0ads_al";
//2007-08-22: federalregister-rss
google_ad_channel = "2005962856";
google_color_border = "CC0000";
google_color_bg = "FFFFFF";
google_color_link = "CC0000";
google_color_text = "000000";
google_color_url = "008000";
//-->
</script>
<script type="text/javascript"
  src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">
</script>
]]></description>
  <guid>http://thefederalregister.com/d.p/2008-06-17-E8-13566</guid>
  <pubDate>Tue, Jun 17 2008 11:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
  <title><![CDATA[  Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A330 Airplanes; and Model  A340-200 and -300 Airplanes]]></title>
  <link>http://thefederalregister.com/d.p/2008-06-17-E8-13568</link>
  <description><![CDATA[ We are revising an original NPRM for the products listed 
above. This action revises the original NPRM by expanding the scope. 
This proposed AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness 
information (MCAI) originated by an aviation authority of another 
country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation  product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as:</p>
<h3>* * * * *</h3>
<p>    The aim of * * * [Special Federal Aviation Regulation (SFAR) 88] 
is to require all holders of type certificates * * * to carry out a  definition review against explosion hazards.<br/>
The unsafe condition is the potential of ignition sources inside fuel 
tanks, which, in combination with flammable fuel vapors, could result 
in fuel tank explosions and consequent loss of the airplane. The 
proposed AD would require actions that are intended to address the 
unsafe condition described in the MCAI.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
google_ad_client = "pub-2051746026283201";
google_ad_width = 728;
google_ad_height = 15;
google_ad_format = "728x15_0ads_al";
//2007-08-22: federalregister-rss
google_ad_channel = "2005962856";
google_color_border = "CC0000";
google_color_bg = "FFFFFF";
google_color_link = "CC0000";
google_color_text = "000000";
google_color_url = "008000";
//-->
</script>
<script type="text/javascript"
  src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">
</script>
]]></description>
  <guid>http://thefederalregister.com/d.p/2008-06-17-E8-13568</guid>
  <pubDate>Tue, Jun 17 2008 11:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
  <title><![CDATA[  Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 767-200 and -300 Series  Airplanes]]></title>
  <link>http://thefederalregister.com/d.p/2008-06-17-E8-13579</link>
  <description><![CDATA[ This document revises an earlier proposed airworthiness 
directive (AD), applicable to certain Boeing Model 767200 and 300 
series airplanes. That proposed rule would have required replacing 
certain doormounted escape slides and slideraft assemblies with new 
slideraft assemblies; replacing certain escape system latches with new 
latches; and modifying or replacing certain counterbalance assemblies 
with new counterbalance assemblies; as applicable. This new action 
revises the proposed rule by extending the compliance time, adding 
requirements to install a longer firing cable and test the valve of the 
inflation trigger system of the slideraft, and, for certain airplanes, 
adding procedures to adjust the door counter balance systems. The 
actions specified by this new proposed AD are intended to prevent the 
escape slides and sliderafts of the forward and midcabin entry and 
service doors from being too steep for evacuation in the event that the 
airplane rotates onto the aft fuselage into the extreme tip<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
google_ad_client = "pub-2051746026283201";
google_ad_width = 728;
google_ad_height = 15;
google_ad_format = "728x15_0ads_al";
//2007-08-22: federalregister-rss
google_ad_channel = "2005962856";
google_color_border = "CC0000";
google_color_bg = "FFFFFF";
google_color_link = "CC0000";
google_color_text = "000000";
google_color_url = "008000";
//-->
</script>
<script type="text/javascript"
  src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">
</script>
]]></description>
  <guid>http://thefederalregister.com/d.p/2008-06-17-E8-13579</guid>
  <pubDate>Tue, Jun 17 2008 11:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
  <title><![CDATA[  Exemptions From Average Fuel Economy Standards; Passenger  Automobile Average Fuel Economy Standards]]></title>
  <link>http://thefederalregister.com/d.p/2008-06-17-E8-13505</link>
  <description><![CDATA[ This proposed decision responds to a petition filed by Mosler 
Automotive (Mosler) requesting that it be exempted from the generally 
applicable corporate average fuel economy (CAFE) standard of 27.5 miles 
per gallon (mpg) for model years 2008, 2009 and 2010, and that, for 
Mosler, lower alternative standards be established. In this document, 
NHTSA proposes that the requested exemption be granted to Mosler and 
that an alternative standard of 22.1 mpg be established for MYs 2008 
through 2010.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
google_ad_client = "pub-2051746026283201";
google_ad_width = 728;
google_ad_height = 15;
google_ad_format = "728x15_0ads_al";
//2007-08-22: federalregister-rss
google_ad_channel = "2005962856";
google_color_border = "CC0000";
google_color_bg = "FFFFFF";
google_color_link = "CC0000";
google_color_text = "000000";
google_color_url = "008000";
//-->
</script>
<script type="text/javascript"
  src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">
</script>
]]></description>
  <guid>http://thefederalregister.com/d.p/2008-06-17-E8-13505</guid>
  <pubDate>Tue, Jun 17 2008 11:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
  <title><![CDATA[  Illinois Central Railroad Company--Abandonment Exemption--in  Ballard County, KY]]></title>
  <link>http://thefederalregister.com/d.p/2008-06-17-E8-13328</link>
  <description><![CDATA[
</p><p>    Illinois Central Railroad Company (IC), \1\ has filed a verified 
notice of exemption under 49 CFR Part 1152 Subpart FExempt 
Abandonments to abandon approximately 1.66 miles of its rail line 
between mileposts 364.54 and 366.20, in Wickliffe, Ballard County, 
KY.\2\ The line traverses United States Postal Service Zip Code 42087.
    \1\ IC is a wholly owned subsidiary of Canadian National Railway  Company.<br/>
    \2\ IC states that the involved line parallels its historic main 
line and did not provide access to any new shippers upon its 
acquisition, and that IC has been operating the line as a passing 
siding for several decades. IC indicates that this filing was made 
out of an abundance of caution as to whether abandonment authority  or an exemption is required prior to removal of the track.</p><p>    IC has certified that: (1) No local traffic has moved over the line 
for at least 2 years; (2) there is no overhead traffic on the line; (3) 
no formal complaint filed by a user of rail service on the line (or <script type="text/javascript">
<!--
google_ad_client = "pub-2051746026283201";
google_ad_width = 728;
google_ad_height = 15;
google_ad_format = "728x15_0ads_al";
//2007-08-22: federalregister-rss
google_ad_channel = "2005962856";
google_color_border = "CC0000";
google_color_bg = "FFFFFF";
google_color_link = "CC0000";
google_color_text = "000000";
google_color_url = "008000";
//-->
</script>
<script type="text/javascript"
  src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">
</script>
]]></description>
  <guid>http://thefederalregister.com/d.p/2008-06-17-E8-13328</guid>
  <pubDate>Tue, Jun 17 2008 11:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
  <title><![CDATA[  Union Pacific Railroad Company--Abandonment Exemption--in  Maricopa County, AZ]]></title>
  <link>http://thefederalregister.com/d.p/2008-06-17-E8-13058</link>
  <description><![CDATA[
</p><p>    On May 28, 2008, Union Pacific Railroad Company (UP) filed with the 
Surface Transportation Board a petition under 49 U.S.C. 10502 for 
exemption from the provisions of 49 U.S.C. 10903 to abandon a 2.91mile 
line of railroad known as the Litchfield Industrial Lead, extending 
from milepost 889.34 (Litchfield Junction) to milepost 892.25 
(Litchfield Park) in Maricopa County, AZ. The line traverses U.S.  Postal Service Zip Codes 85338 and 85395.</p><p>    The line does not contain federally granted rightsofway. Any 
documentation in UP's possession will be made available promptly to  those requesting it.</p><p>    The interest of railroad employees will be protected by the 
conditions set forth in Oregon Short Line R. Co.AbandonmentGoshen,  360 I.C.C. 91 (1979).</p><p>    By issuance of this notice, the Board is instituting an exemption 
proceeding pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 10502(b). A final decision will be  issued by September 15, 2008.</p><p>    Any offer of financial assistance (OFA) under 49 CFR 1152.27(b)(2) 
will be due no la<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
google_ad_client = "pub-2051746026283201";
google_ad_width = 728;
google_ad_height = 15;
google_ad_format = "728x15_0ads_al";
//2007-08-22: federalregister-rss
google_ad_channel = "2005962856";
google_color_border = "CC0000";
google_color_bg = "FFFFFF";
google_color_link = "CC0000";
google_color_text = "000000";
google_color_url = "008000";
//-->
</script>
<script type="text/javascript"
  src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">
</script>
]]></description>
  <guid>http://thefederalregister.com/d.p/2008-06-17-E8-13058</guid>
  <pubDate>Tue, Jun 17 2008 11:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>

